paktinat
Members-
Posts
63 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
paktinat last won the day on May 9 2008
paktinat had the most liked content!
About paktinat
- Birthday 05/13/1985
Profile Information
-
Name
Michael
-
Location
UA
-
Vehicles(s)
04WRX, 86GTI
paktinat's Achievements
Newbie (1/14)
13
Reputation
-
They don't give much, but I had a contact who used to work for these folks: http://www.ait-recycle.com/purchase-commodities-columbus-ohio
-
Looking for any other trades?
-
http://i.imgur.com/VAMYjJh.jpg
-
Not until 2017. If anyone else was wondering why they had to be mailed, they are manufactured out of state according to the dispatch.
-
I don't know if they do sedation but my dental office is pretty cool: http://www.uadentalgroup.com/ Also if it works out and you tell them I sent you I get money or something.
-
http://i.imgur.com/NeQYjl.jpg
-
have a picture?
-
http://i.imgur.com/dmVCBZel.jpg
-
Preemptive congratulations to that young man's successful libel lawsuit against the NYPost. I hope he gets paid.
-
http://i.imgur.com/QsAhk.gif
-
Someone get that pick to the LAPD so they can start shooting up random trucks driven by asian women.
-
More reason to hate cable barriers (first 2013 Viper casualty)
paktinat replied to Mallard's topic in Passing Lane
Its a shame someone passed away but it seems the barrier did exactly what it was engineered to do; prevent an out of control vehicle from going left of center and endangering innocent drivers. From what I have read cable barriers have a lower fatality rate when compared to rigid barriers because they absorb some of the collision energy in the cable tension. They also have the advantage of being ridiculously cheaper then rigid barriers. I can't find any material stating that cable barriers are any more or less fatal for motocycles. One study in europe came to the conclusion that cable barriers had no increased fatality rate, mainly because if a motorcycle is out of shape enough to hit a barrier they are likely to die regardless of the barrier design. -
The complaint filed with the court, on March 26, "the named defendant did recklessly violate the terms of a protection order issued pursuant to Ohio revised code 2919.26 or 3113.31. Defendant came to [victim]'s home to pick up their daughter and filed a interference with custody report with Columbus police while at the property."
-
Both times to an undercover cop. http://www.buffalonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130314/CITYANDREGION/130319543/1003
-
PM me if your sale falls through.