coltboostin Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 coltboostin....quit living in the past. you dont have your car anymore, so you trap nothing. Your right, but I trapped the speed in my sig. Deal with it. It seems you took an English course from the same place bottlefedfucus did, because you are unfamiliar with the past tense of a verb. And the new whip will be faster anyways, so its a moot point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linc5.0 Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 I know you trapped that...i simply stated, you are not now. wow, you dissed my english...good come back. Im pretty sure anything you put together is not considered a "whip", a colt is not a "whip". A "whip" would be something that does not look like a P.O.S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linc5.0 Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 ps. if you would like to run me...let me know. here is what im working on .notice where the exhaust dumps....and there is another one on the other side to match http://images.traderonline.com/EMedia/tarchive2/720/29574/00522505306.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 I know you trapped that...i simply stated, you are not now. wow, you dissed my english...good come back. Im pretty sure anything you put together is not considered a "whip", a colt is not a "whip". A "whip" would be something that does not look like a P.O.S. You know-your right. http://thelotspot.com/images/jp/Colt06/DSC00162-1.JPG That does look like complete shit doesn’t it? ps. if you would like to run me...let me know. here is what im working on .notice where the exhaust dumps....and there is another one on the other side to match http://images.traderonline.com/EMedia/tarchive2/720/29574/00522505306.jpg What-is that a 750 with a lil’ baby turbo(s) on it? Awe-how cute! You just signed yourself up for a 60 roll. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hal Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 No need I trap at 10mph, you are going down!!! http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f277/punkhott712/red-bull.jpg + http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f277/punkhott712/Thirst4.jpg = TEH WIN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linc5.0 Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 actually kawasaki no longer makes a 750. its a zx-10r(twin turbo)...250hp on stock wheel base....can be way more...need extended swing arm. the motor looks nice,now show the car that it is in Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hal Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 Just do a search if you want to see pics of the colt. There is no reason for anyone to have ANOTHER damn thread about it, this has been beaten to death many times over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abuseU1300 Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 actually kawasaki no longer makes a 750. its a zx-10r(twin turbo)...250hp on stock wheel base....can be way more...need extended swing arm. the motor looks nice,now show the car that it is inIs this yours ? I remember the guy who built it and a turbo 636 for his wife ? Ohh, I also tried PMing you back about mowing my rentals but your messages are full . Just PM me your Name # and I will put you on my list . Coltboostin , I have a little baby turbo on my 1.3L , can you sign me up for a 60 roll ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linc5.0 Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 No it is a guy in Kentucky...in negotations to purchase....but i think he is high in asking price.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abuseU1300 Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 No it is a guy in Kentucky...in negotations to purchase....but i think he is high in asking price....Thats cool . I seen the build up on it , you should look at some of the pics . If I remember right the welds on headers and dumps looked poorly done and the turbo design is bad . Just something you might want to check up on . Over all the bike is very nice . If he wants anything over 9K for it hes asking to much . If you want I will help you get something nice , just let me know . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abuseU1300 Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 actually kawasaki no longer makes a 750. its a zx-10r(twin turbo)...250hp on stock wheel base....can be way more...need extended swing arm. the motor looks nice,now show the car that it is inheres the link let me know if it works . http://www.suzukihayabusa.org/forum/index.php?topic=36073.0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linc5.0 Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 Yea ive seen all the pics of everything...thats what i mean by over priced. he's asking 14k and there is DEFINATELY some welds that are questionable and for safety sake i would have redone...I agree with anything more than 9k. thats why i havent bought it. im very close togiving up and just buying a Beautiful Busa! Either way im waiting till spring cuz its NOT snowing which means im not making money! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPLN SUX Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 Exactly. The Colt may very well have been the fastest roll car on here when it was intact. So, I'm not sure why the FWD are throwing such a fit. I believe i was the first to chime in about FWD's... my worry isnt that the FWDs wont be fast, my argument was with said "rules" of the ladder, specifically the starting speed. In an application such as mine, max power couldnt even be reached untill almost 80mph (well into 3rd gear). 25lbs of boost is enough to piss traction into the wind even at 40 or 50mph, let alone 20... then even after that, theres spray. My argument was that even if the car makes 600whp, it wont matter because by the time it would be able to actully make 600whp, the race is already over. Now im sure there would be a counter with, "Well so and so mkae XXXwhp and doesnt have that problem." While that may be true, its the torque that worries me. A 600whp 2 Litre is only going to make 350-400lb-ft, and thats at some high ass RPM. Im looking at 500 lb-ft @ roughly 4000rpm...not exactly good for slow rolls. Even with radials, it would lose traction, and if slicks were used, well say bye bye to the axels if not the tranny. I dont think there should be seperate classes by any means, i would just think that a higher starting roll would relieve a little bit of the handy cap of FWD traction issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V8 Beast Posted January 19, 2007 Report Share Posted January 19, 2007 Hal, I have an expresso i.v. = GAME OVER!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 Just do a search if you want to see pics of the colt. There is no reason for anyone to have ANOTHER damn thread about it, this has been beaten to death many times over. Agreed-and my point was it simply was not a bad looking car (which most of CR agreed) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 Coltboostin , I have a little baby turbo on my 1.3L , can you sign me up for a 60 roll ?? Yup. And BTW-do you have a Motorhead kit on the car? If so-we used to build most of the hard parts for him, and we still do the big guy (70mm turbo) manifolds. YOU would appreciate me saying I have seen the top of the mountain, and it was F-in scary. Denis' personal Busa with an Ultra kit @28psi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 I believe i was the first to chime in about FWD's... my worry isnt that the FWDs wont be fast, my argument was with said "rules" of the ladder, specifically the starting speed. A 600whp 2 Litre is only going to make 350-400lb-ft, and thats at some high ass RPM. Im looking at 500 lb-ft @ roughly 4000rpm...not exactly good for slow rolls. Even with radials, it would lose traction, and if slicks were used, well say bye bye to the axels if not the tranny. I agree-40 rolls were death for the Colt. We may as well have been digging at that point! Just for reference-I made 449ft lbs when @ 600whp. It would have been more with a smaller turbo on the car yikes-triple post action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hal Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 Hal, I have an expresso i.v. = GAME OVER!! I concede sir. JP, you're right the colt wasn't a bad looking machine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 Yea ive seen all the pics of everything...thats what i mean by over priced. he's asking 14k and there is DEFINATELY some welds that are questionable and for safety sake i would have redone...I agree with anything more than 9k. thats why i havent bought it. im very close togiving up and just buying a Beautiful Busa! Either way im waiting till spring cuz its NOT snowing which means im not making money! I took a look at the pics, and you would gain 20 or more WHP and some spool time if you routed those turbo outlets as separate pieces. I dont know if that set up will break, but it looks like it was designed by a 5 year old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 I concede sir. JP, you're right the colt wasn't a bad looking machine. Thanx you sir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPLN SUX Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 I agree-40 rolls were death for the Colt. We may as well have been digging at that point! Just for reference-I made 449ft lbs when @ 600whp. It would have been more with a smaller turbo on the car yikes-triple post action. what were your RPM levels though??? 7000? and probably on the surge line... im talking about pulling 25psi at 3500 and making 500lbft from 4000 on up to 6000... theres just no chance to hook that up. Id imagine that you were breaking lose on the top end, then really blowing smoke on the gear change, im talking about lighting a fire before even getting to the next gear... i dunno, maybe im thinking too pesimisticly, but i think its going to be like trying to drive a Viper down the 1/4 with 5in wide spare tires on the back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linc5.0 Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 colt...i agree the guy that built this machine....had a clue of what he was doing, just NOt a good one.lol. there is quite abit to that setup that would have to change.but it is damn sexy though.i think it is only running 5-7 psi as well(stock motor). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Bruh Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 http://thelotspot.com/images/jp/Colt06/DSC00162-1.JPG SWEET you got the honda VC! :gay: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAOLE Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 King of Rally's Drive Thru on Livingston Avenue... That one is easy... who can bring the biggest gun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
integranator Posted January 20, 2007 Report Share Posted January 20, 2007 JP, when did you trap 149mph? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.