Science Abuse Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 So this is OK then? http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/11/01/halloween.slaying.ap/index.html?iref=mpstoryview Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putty Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 I heard about this the other day....this guy needs back in jail. Idiot shouldn't have had a gun to begin with!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ODoyle Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 I didn't think ex cons were allowed to own firearms poriod. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 Another case of Guns don't kill people, Stupid People kill people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putty Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 I didn't think ex cons were allowed to own firearms poriod. Any person with a felony can't...Not just ex cons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lustalbert Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 Correct, a felon can not own a firearm. Or a machette. Or other instuments similar. I don't belive the castle law offers the protection of self defense untill the intruder enters your home (forced entry, or an open window), so, no, the castle law would not apply here. I however, am not a lawyer, so I will defer to someone liscenced to practice law for a final answer on this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty2Hotty Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 You don't know much about the Castle Doctrine do ya? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHaze Posted November 4, 2008 Report Share Posted November 4, 2008 So this is OK then? http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/11/01/halloween.slaying.ap/index.html?iref=mpstoryview Hmm, you sure do bash others for not doing research and yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Abuse Posted November 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2008 Yeah I could just call "karma" and say I wanted to relax and post without thinking, or I could point out that the only thing which makes this open and shut is his prior conviction. If it'd been some old paranoid fart, lawyers would be activated. Anyone remember the guy that threw 3 shotgun blasts at a kid toilet papering his house? The story ended with "no charges filed". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.