SpaceGhost Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 You spelled win wrong. I did? The old F1 Ferrari cars had 12 cyclinders that spun to 12k rpm. How is this better? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRed05 Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 I did? The old F1 Ferrari cars had 12 cyclinders that spun to 12k rpm. How is this better? I added more to my last post... But F1 has had pretty much every kind of motor, they were turbocharged in the late 80s too, now they were V6's, but were still 1.5L and they dominated the N/A V12's. Being 4 cylinder turbo's isn't going to effect how much power they make, should add to the excitement while benefiting the consumer in the long run. Don't you have a 4banger turbo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 I added more to my last post... But F1 has had pretty much every kind of motor, they were turbocharged in the late 80s too, now they were V6's, but were still 1.5L and they dominated the N/A V12's. Being 4 cylinder turbo's isn't going to effect how much power they make, should add to the excitement while benefiting the consumer in the long run. Don't you have a 4banger turbo? I do, but I expect better from F1, I have the opinion that it has continued downhill since Schumacher retired from Ferrari. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.