greg1647545532 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 It's not hard to see the setup. If they can't convince the viewer that Avery is unjustly convicted in the beginning and then righteously freed that first time they can't get the viewer invested in it. Its a setup to skewer the system and they so blatantly telegraphed it they might as well have been using an actual telegraph. Wait, are you saying that the facts are biased? That simply by telling the viewer that he was wrongly convicted they're somehow being unfair? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geeto67 Posted January 7, 2016 Report Share Posted January 7, 2016 Wrongly convicted is kind of a loaded term. It can mean that he didn't commit the crime or it can mean that the system was tampered with irrespective as to whether he did it or not. Something the show is exploiting and based on the different viewpoints here successfully. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattKatz Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 All I know is NETFLIX is gonna make bank off this shit....PERIOD. That's a FACT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg1647545532 Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 Geeto, I only read the first 6 words of your last post but I feel comfortable saying that the whole thing was a pointless tangent. Western Union told me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patterson Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 Skipping. I think it was Brendens older brother, and Step Dad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oh8sti Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 Skipping. I think it was Brendens older brother, and Step Dad. Same same Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattKatz Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 I actually think the brother and the Ex boyfriend seem sketchy.....The brother seems to think everything is funny....Something isn't right with that dude. And the Ex boyfriend having passwords and getting into VM and shit....That's Crazy stalker level shit IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2 Sweet Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 I actually think the brother and the Ex boyfriend seem sketchy.....The brother seems to think everything is funny....Something isn't right with that dude. And the Ex boyfriend having passwords and getting into VM and shit....That's Crazy stalker level shit IMO. I thought the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShowHBK Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 Same same http://i.imgur.com/pIvKZxD.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimmel1647545512 Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 I am going to win the powerball and hire him some OJ style lawyers:gabe: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC K9 Posted January 8, 2016 Report Share Posted January 8, 2016 Skipping. I think it was Brendens older brother, and Step Dad. Yes I actually think the brother and the Ex boyfriend seem sketchy.....The brother seems to think everything is funny....Something isn't right with that dude. And the Ex boyfriend having passwords and getting into VM and shit....That's Crazy stalker level shit IMO. And Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEVE-O Posted January 9, 2016 Report Share Posted January 9, 2016 How about they try to say she was killed on the bed (but again no evidence to support this from Brendon's story) Then they say she was killed in the garage but yet can not prove that is the crime scene because there is no blood splatter or anything else besides some fragment on 1 single .22 bullet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evil8 Posted January 9, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2016 Why was Colburn calling in the plate number 3 days before the Rav4 was found? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEVE-O Posted January 9, 2016 Report Share Posted January 9, 2016 Why was Colburn calling in the plate number 3 days before the Rav4 was found? He says he must have been told the plate because he didn't have it or see it when he called it in Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furloaf Posted January 9, 2016 Report Share Posted January 9, 2016 Did he get to watch Wrestlemania though? I haven't watched the series. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstmg8 Posted January 11, 2016 Report Share Posted January 11, 2016 Did he get to watch Wrestlemania though? I haven't watched the series. Nope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstmg8 Posted January 11, 2016 Report Share Posted January 11, 2016 For those who were interested in this documentary, you will also find "my brothers keeper" interesting. It's on Netflix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC K9 Posted January 11, 2016 Report Share Posted January 11, 2016 For those who were interested in this documentary, you will also find "my brothers keeper" interesting. It's on Netflix. That is a nutty documentary too. Very good. And Sad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC K9 Posted January 11, 2016 Report Share Posted January 11, 2016 So, I finished Episode 10 over the weekend. The biased documentary worked on me. At this point, I am convinced SA and Brendan didn't do it; barring any other forthcoming evidence of course. I am also convinced, fk Manitowoc country regardless if they did it or not. That "trial" was a travesty. And the whole time, my wife and I were saying, "There is something not right about the beady eyed, high pitched voice special prosecutor. We got a pervy, rapey, fettish feeling about him. Then sure enough, after talking to the media before any verdict, he was saying what a monster SA was, and making all these accusations about him, then he is the one that turns out should be taken off the streets and thrown in jail. Sexting clients, adultry...fk that dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lauren Posted January 11, 2016 Report Share Posted January 11, 2016 To find guilt there has to be beyond a reasonable doubt and the prosecution just couldn't prove that. I feel bad for Steve Avery and Brenden. Hopefully they can get fair trials in the future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patterson Posted January 11, 2016 Report Share Posted January 11, 2016 Did he get to watch Wrestlemania though? I haven't watched the series. Nope That's the real travesty. All he wanted to do was get home and watch Wrestlemania. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmaa Posted January 12, 2016 Report Share Posted January 12, 2016 One thing I found interesting is one of the lawyers stated when the jury started deliberations the initial vote was overwhelmingly not guilty. What happened in that room to change so many people's minds? The creators were interviewed and mentioned this as well: "We were contacted by a juror [shortly after the series debuted], and this person said that they were not convinced of Steven's guilt but they were scared for their personal safety. They were going to be the ones to hold out for a mistrial. I don't know if something like that would happen in a big city, so maybe that's one example" Article: http://www.vox.com/2016/1/11/10748138/netflix-making-a-murderer-review-interview Interesting if true: http://www.people.com/article/steven-avery-juror-says-two-jurors-related-county-employees Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstmg8 Posted January 12, 2016 Report Share Posted January 12, 2016 The juror that was dismissed had a similar story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmaa Posted January 12, 2016 Report Share Posted January 12, 2016 Oh and both Ken Krantz & Len Kachinsky should be banned from practicing law... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmaa Posted January 12, 2016 Report Share Posted January 12, 2016 The juror that was dismissed had a similar story. It may have been him. The context of the quote above. "It's a little bit hard to say, but perhaps one example is what the defense was up against in trying to make an argument that Steven was being framed by law enforcement. That's a very different argument to make in a big city, where the jury member is not going to run into the police officer at the diner. I think there's some evidence of that [in Avery's case]." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.