kawi kid Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 http://drudgegae.iavian.net/r?hop=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wnd.com%2F2012%2F07%2Fobamas-social-security-number-challenged%2F Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrown57 Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Logic'd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gump Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Interesting. Too many facts for mainstream media? I'd agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawi kid Posted July 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Maybe Ohio could make a big difference in this election after all lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gump Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 It didn't really say why he could not have had a face to face in Connecticut to get the number? Can the issue a dead persons number to another person? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chevysoldier Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 It's Bush's fault. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disclaimer Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Straws, keep grasping for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crb Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Straws, keep grasping for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReconRat Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 (edited) Need to see the original SSAN application, and check the zip code given.If a typist goofed and typed "0" instead of "9", a Connecticut SSAN would have been issued instead of one from Hawaii.the zip code for the Dunhams in 1976 was 96814 - if one replaces the 9 with a 0, one gets zipcode 06814, a zip code for Danbury, CTedit: ok, it doesn't explain why the duplicate SSAN with a guy named Ludwig from CT born in 1890 that died in Hawaii in 1981.Edit again: The SSAN from Hawaii that might have been typo'd (that looks like it's from CT), isn't the same SSAN as the one issued in CT when at Harvard that is a duplicate SSAN from somebody else in CT. Ok, now I'm confused. I give up. Edited July 6, 2012 by ReconRat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gump Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Best way to hide something white collar is to make it complex...come on Recon! I was enjoying reading your analysis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReconRat Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 (edited) Me again... the thingy about duplicate SSAN with dude named Ludwig appears to be false. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/ssn.asp Although Snopes is getting to be a bit hard to trust sometimes. They make mistakes also.Still working on why two SSANs... the only good true one is 042-68-xxxx. Which assumes a typo when registered in Hawaii. Also possible that the first three digit thing identifying the state was stopped prior to that. Not sure. Edited July 6, 2012 by ReconRat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crb Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 (edited) . The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since. Per the same snopes link. Social Security DepartmentHow about we just vote his @ss out end of story! Edited July 6, 2012 by crb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cg2112 Posted July 17, 2012 Report Share Posted July 17, 2012 http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.htmlOne should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crb Posted July 17, 2012 Report Share Posted July 17, 2012 http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.htmlOne should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.You are a day late a dollar short! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.