There has been talk of that, but many of the pundits have been saying that doing it that way is ridiculous for obvious reasons. Example: when A&M trounced SC on opening night, SC was highly ranked and considered a dark horse NC contender. It had a big effect on A&M's ranking at the time. We now know that SC is a fraud, and further, that A&M are as well. That counted as a "quality win" then, but it wouldn't now. Another example: TCU beat KState a little while back, and thus, KState dropped a few spots. Baylor will play KState in the future, and if they win, they will be beating the same team, albeit a lower ranked same team. The general consensus is that that win SHOULD count equally for both teams, regardless of what the ranking was at the time for KState.
Our loss to VT, had VT continued to win and become a contender in the ACC, while bad at the time, would now be considered a "quality loss". As that isn't what has happened, it isn't. Although, their win over Duke helps the case a little bit.