Jump to content

CobraKevin

Members
  • Posts

    538
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by CobraKevin

  1. Summary: Allison (Katherine Heigl) makes a quality living working for E! Ben (Seth Rogan) is a pothead who sits at home all the time with his buddies getting high and hammered constantly, living off a one-time settlement check of $14,000 from like 10 years ago. One fateful night, Allison decides to go with her sister to a club and get wasted and have a good time. Allison and Ben end up crossing paths, hitting things off (sorta), going home and having a one-night stand. Allison finds out Ben's a lowlife (with his great idea of an online adult website) and really doesn't feel like talking to him again. Things change when she finds out she's pregnant. Allison decides to take a leap of faith and attempt to make the relationship work, as does Ben. Things obviously don't go as planned in a textbook case of "opposites attract", making for some nothing-short-of-hilarious comedy. Pros: From the creators of 40-year-old Virgin, you can definitely expect a lot of laughs. Easily a movie you and the guys could spend a couple of hours laughing your asses off at, or a semi-romantic comedy the ladies should enjoy. Did I mention Katherine Heigl is gorgeous? Cons: Definitely some slow parts, especially towards the end, Oh, and Ms. Heigl is never nekkid. Conclusion: 4.0/5.0. While I wouldn't say it was one of the funniest movies of all time, there were a number of hysterical moments in the film. There was probably a straight 15-minute portion of film towards the end where I barely heard any laughter (in a PACKED theater), which kinda drug things on. If you liked 40-year-old Virgin, this movie is a must-see. If you never saw 40-year-old Virgin, shame on you. Go see both. -Kevin
  2. http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/5781/fuckinwalruskk9.jpg
  3. I'm kinda confused as to why he's got two different horsepower numbers while on nitrous. He mentions 730 before the ET, then 780 at the bottom of "engine components". I mean he could have different nozzles obviously, but I would think he would be advertising his most impressive numbers. Regardless, that kind of power is easily 9-second range with proper traction. Mike Tymensky has gone deep into the 9's in his N/A 4V 'Stang with less than 700 rwhp. He traps in the mid 130's if I'm not mistaken. -Kevin
  4. The Full Metal Jacket was awesome, the Few Good Men had a few missing lines (that one I have memorized myself). He's not bad, but I just can't get over how "geeky" he looks, especially trying to pull off Jack Nicholson. -Kevin
  5. Not even worth my time to type a full in-depth review. The only good things in the movie were Ashley Judd nekkid and some comic relief from Harry Connick Jr. Don't go see this in theatres. You will be disappointed if you do. -Kevin
  6. Wow...a LITTLE gay. -Kevin
  7. Honestly: 1. Chuck Liddell 2. Fedor Emelianenko 3. Vitor Belfort Semi-Honestly: 1. Joe Pesci 2. Al Pacino 3. a Cell Phone
  8. He directed Bad Boys 1 and 2, Armageddon, and The Rock. And you doubted him on Tranformers? Tsk Tsk. -Kevin
  9. CobraKevin

    wtf

    Yeah, that was a World of Warcraft video they were watching and lip synching two. A female Tauren (cow people) was "singing", with a male tauren, undead, and troll chiming in I believe. Been a while since I've seen it. -Kevin
  10. [bill Lumberg] Hey, sir. What's happening? Um, I'm gonna have to go ahead and ask you to off yourself, mkay? That way we'd have some room for, uh, some less-than-complete-retards to occupy the air we breathe. If you could just go ahead and do that by toMORROW, that would be great. Mkay? [/bill Lumberg] -Kevin
  11. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! That's exactly what i was thinkin. It was like it was a completely limp, non-workin cock she was munchin' on. Fuckin weird man-bitches. -Kevin
  12. Lol! "What's the score of the Red Wings game?" Funny stuff. -Kevin
  13. I'm actually kinda worried that both my big toes are ingrown. The left side of my left big toenail and the right side of my right big toenail seem to be digging into the skin, pushing it up over the nail. And it's rather painful if I push on either. -Kevin
  14. Wow...just fucking wow. I hate you Sam. With a passion. -Kevin
  15. Kate Beckinsale would definitely be my top pick. I think Elisha Cuthbert (24, Girl Next Door) would be up there, as well as Elisa Dushku (Bring It On, Wrong Turn). -Kevin
  16. I was actually thinking about it. But some part of me just can't help but believe it'll turn out like some phone sex episode where the ACTUAL Tania bitch is like 350 lbs with the clap. So I passed. -Kevin
  17. Is there a way to record a DVR program onto a DVD disk? If there is, by all means i'll hook ya up. Not sure how that might be done, though. -Kevin
  18. I might leave tonights show on DVR for the rest of my life. I used to watch it all the time with my grandpa (R.I.P.) and have been catching it now and then at work on my lunch breaks. It's definitely one of those staples of modern television that people will never forget, and might be somethin' I might wanna show my kids someday . And I'd rather them show reruns for life than replace Bob with a different host. -Kevin
  19. Very nice numbers, John. Damn. -Kevin
  20. Summary: Sort of leaving where 28 Days Later left off, the opening scene is still in the time where the infected were running rampant. Fast-forwarding to the near future, the U.S. Military has determined that mainland Great Britain is free of infection and sets up a base camp called District 1. District 1 is now the future of Britain where over 15,000 inhabitants are beginning to repopulate the nation, with more people being shipped in. District 1 is a heavily reinforced military settlement guarded with tanks, sharpshooters, security systems, back-up power systems, etc. and is a quarantined safe haven for all civilians. A father, who lost his wife and a number of friends in the path of the infected, is reunited with his children who were away at the time. These kids take an illegal trip to their old house and surprisingly find the mom/wife alive and apparantly "virus-free". Once back at the facility, however, the virus returns and wreaks havoc once again on the inhabitants. Pros: I think 28 Days Later took your average "scary" zombie flick and added the attributes to ACTUALLY make them terrifying - speed and aggression. 28 Weeks Later takes this to another level at a far less boring pace with more blood, more gore, more violence, more "jumpy" parts, and less drama. Cons: Still some slow parts (though arguably necessary), the actors/actresses were B-list and below again (though the acting wasn't terrible), and I personally feel the military made some dumb fucking decisions. Conclusion: 4.5/5.0. I thought the plausible method of bringing the virus back (which I intentionally left out of the summary for obvious reasons) was very well-played, and I enjoyed the fact that there's more of a storyline other than simply survival. Case in point, if you liked the first one, you should LOVE this one. If you didn't like the first one, you still may very well like this one. -Kevin
  21. Yeah, but like I said i'm not mad or disappointed or anything along those lines. Like you post suggests, I'm sure there's a lot of things that go into photography that a lot of people don't know about and therefore you can always get those picture-perfect shots and you don't really have time nor desire to worry about how many decent pictures you take of each vehicle and all that. Besides, when taking pictures of cars at a track, there's not a whole lot of eventful stuff to catch in film. Even if you took pictures of the times, you wouldn't be able to tell what cars they were for. So all you really have to deal with are burnouts and launches, which a lot of the slower cars don't do. I do really like those on-the-move photos. I'd love to see more of those at the Fall event. Again, very nice job and I can't wait to see more of 'em from future events. -Kevin
×
×
  • Create New...