LJ

Naive. But Obama ran on "HOPE", yet all I see is financial fear mongering from his administration (not to say that the last administration didn't do it)

Blaming Bush for all of it is just as naive as blaming Clinton for all of it.

It's not coincidence, but it isn't the effect most people are making it out to be. It has nothing to do with his actual policies or plans, it is the lack of clarity and lack of real details. I suggest that everyone here that wants to really learn more, should read Prospect Theory and learn some behavioral economics. The fear of uncertainty is one of the most powerful emotions in finance.

At least he is trying? A pork pet project bill and the 2nd half of Bush's bailout? Sounds great to me!

I think this is the case. With the amount of seats lost because of 1994 + the recent Heller case, I don't think they want to even begin to touch this issue.

Brought back from the dead because this one HAS to be posted Today, I just finished having sex with a girl I met at a bar when she reached over and began to play with my balls. When I asked her why she was doing this she responded "I miss mine." FML

Meh, NFA isn't bad, because it actually regulating something that IS more dangerous (ie full auto and explosives) its the civilian ban in 1986 that pisses me off.

The stupidity in this statement is astounding. #1 we are NOT discussing AUTOMATIC weapons, if this was 1934 or 1986, maybe, but not right now in 2009 #2 You really have no idea what you are talking about.

I need to take you to lunch then. Pick your brain. Let me know

Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons Assault weapons ban has absolutely NOTHING to do with automatic weapons

Do you have any experience in hotels? Or know someone who does? I have been looking at buying this hotel that makes good cash flow, but their expenses are through the roof and I have been banging my head on the desk trying to figure out if I could get it to make money.

Yogis Hoagies >*

The real question is, why should someone NOT BE ALLOWED TO OWN an AR-15 or an AK-47. What makes it more dangerous?

ACLU does not and will not take any gun cases. ACLU only handles the civil liberties they feel like handling.

We were told to just notify if you are armed. Basically if you aren't armed, and don't notify, there was nothing that you didn't tell them.

They know you have a CHL, but that can't tell if you are armed or not. That is why you are supposed to notify on traffic stops

Why are you going to lie about her living there? Does it say in the lease that you are not allowed to have someone live with you?

Their type of franchise runs them directly off of a regional computer. They are the only "township" gas station, so the computer prices it up. It's stupid. Although the one dude in there is like my buddy now, knows me by name and everything, lol. Apparently the bakery shop should be open soon, can't wait to gain all my weight back on that.

Oh, I don't think he should try for it, but it is a good STFU point to bring up if she keeps being a bitch about it. Not only would she lose in court, but she would owe another 30 days in rent. Informing people that if they pursue civil action against you will most likely cost THEM money usually shuts them up. Landlord would most likely stay out of it. I know for a fact my dad and grandpa would have, esp if we never had any problems with the tenants.

For basic purposes, yes. Let's not confuse anyone shall we? lol

No such thing as a registered gun

You guys do realize that she doesn't have to legally be on the lease as long as you aren't breaking any housing laws correct? The only reason you add someone to the lease is to give them permission to 1. Submit work orders 2. give consent to enter to management 3. allow entry in lock out situations 4. split liability with the complex for any damages or missed rent. Why anyone is making any kind of deal of her not being on the lease is beyond me. She had a verbal lease with you, she paid her part of the rent, she technically owes you another 30 days of rent if she wants to play hardball. Her stuff is there, take pictures of it. Mail is not the only thing that confirms residency in the state of Ohio. Her stuff being there, her paying you rent and her having a key would confirm residency, therefore would validate your verbal contract. These are all very straightforward, simple, landlord/tenant laws in the state of Ohio. You don't need to lie about squat.

Kenneth Hanson Office: 740-363-1213 Cell: 740-215-6433 Email: khanson@FBYLAW.com

You left out the fact that there is nothing for her to prove. remainder of month +30 is what she is legally responsible for. No lawyer would take it because she has no case

Actually, she owes you another month's rent. She broke a verbal lease without 30 days notice. She was renting from you and you had no relationship with her. It's pretty standard, but basically, you don't owe her a dime. I would also leave the extra money alone, I would just explain that to her.