btw, the 911 really isn't the 'superior' car a lot of people make it out to be...
yes, they have a solid racing record, but a good part of that comes down to class rules, experience, and sheer numbers...
first of all, the engine location doesn't make a whole lot of sense. a 'proper' performance car has the engine mid (not rear) mounted for good weight distribution and a low polar moment of inertia. in the 911's case, tradition wins out. the car has been rear engined for so long we'll never see it changed, despite the fact that a mid engine layout is 'superior'...
second, the suspension really isn't anything to brag about. front struts with either a semi trailing arm or multi link IRS. the 'ideal' performance car would have double wishbones front and rear. don't believe me? look at any purpose built racing car. struts and trailing arms are used because they package well, not because they perform better...
that said, the cars do have their strengths. the boxer engines give a lower cg...
i do like the cars. they've got a lot of 'character' and a lot of potential. they just aren't the best piece of engineering...
[ 28. February 2005, 05:09 PM: Message edited by: recklessOP ]