nurkvinny Posted October 14, 2004 Report Share Posted October 14, 2004 http://www.snopes.com/photos/airplane/a37.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex1647545498 Posted October 14, 2004 Report Share Posted October 14, 2004 That plane looks bad azz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaSSon Posted October 14, 2004 Report Share Posted October 14, 2004 So it's a prop from a movie.... The plot: a UAV goes haywire and starts splashing friendly planes, so they send a fighter up after it. Sounds like a shitty movie. Too small to base a decent movie off of, and why would they send a plane after it? Hell, just let the fucker run out of fuel! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokin5s Posted October 15, 2004 Report Share Posted October 15, 2004 Originally posted by The DropTop: So it's a prop from a movie.... The plot: a UAV goes haywire and starts splashing friendly planes, so they send a fighter up after it. Sounds like a shitty movie. Too small to base a decent movie off of, and why would they send a plane after it? Hell, just let the fucker run out of fuel!the director made FAF and XXX, what do you expect? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtschulze Posted October 16, 2004 Report Share Posted October 16, 2004 Definately not true....Evidence you say??? Look at the third pic or so....It's a chick. No fu(king way the military is going to let some chick fly a new plane first..IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nurkvinny Posted October 16, 2004 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2004 Originally posted by sgtschulze: Definately not true....Evidence you say??? Look at the third pic or so....It's a chick. No fu(king way the military is going to let some chick fly a new plane first..IMO We know. smile.gif The Snopes link explains what the pictures are. Even if you only read the "rumor", it says they were test-fitting it for the catapult. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avenger1647545502 Posted October 16, 2004 Report Share Posted October 16, 2004 It'll be a crappy movie, because of one simple fact: Jessica Biel stars in a movie that requires her to wear a flightsuit, and not tight hiphugger jeans. Dammit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotarded1647545491 Posted October 16, 2004 Report Share Posted October 16, 2004 Originally posted by sgtschulze: Look at the third pic or so....It's a chick. No fu(king way the military is going to let some chick fly a new plane first..IMO ...Yeah, Chicks should be barefoot and pregnant. Make me a sammich bitch! graemlins/thumb.gif You sir, quite possibly could be the most ignorant and sexist neandertal alive today...IMO of course! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cougar_55555 Posted October 16, 2004 Report Share Posted October 16, 2004 lol, they didnt even do a good job at making it "look" like it could fly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jpurdy2003 Posted October 17, 2004 Report Share Posted October 17, 2004 That site is crawling with spyware. Originally posted by Rotarded: ...Yeah, Chicks should be barefoot and pregnant. Make me a sammich bitch! graemlins/thumb.gif You sir, quite possibly could be the most ignorant and sexist neandertal alive today...IMO of course! As a urban, Northern male chauvanist, I am offended by your assumption that we're all toothless hicks. Women should be on the pill and in stilettos, not barefoot and pregnant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.