ImUrOBGYN Posted November 28, 2007 Report Share Posted November 28, 2007 Anyone with experience with these plz chime in. Which one is the best bang for buck? Are the II and Neo worth the extra dough? I'll be doing my own research, of course, but would like to hear actual experiences. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbird Posted November 28, 2007 Report Share Posted November 28, 2007 I don't really know much about the original. I actually have a II, and from my knowledge the only difference with the neo is that it can control vtec, and has more inciments for tuning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPLN SUX Posted November 28, 2007 Report Share Posted November 28, 2007 We tried to use a II on andys legacy... but we really didnt see any results from it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drewhop Posted November 28, 2007 Report Share Posted November 28, 2007 Im not completely positive but difference between the S-afc and afc 2 is that the 2 has a knock sensor where the regular afc does not. I had afc2 on my supra and loved it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
s13 Posted November 28, 2007 Report Share Posted November 28, 2007 You can't tune shit with any of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbospec29 Posted November 28, 2007 Report Share Posted November 28, 2007 You can't tune shit with any of them. Its how I tune my car... Works pretty good for a mild boosted car that has little aftermarket in the ECU area. I have the SAFCII btw, the neo looks pretty sweet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.