AJ Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 and people who like small v8s 427 small block isn't really small unless you mean external size and weight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
copperhead Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 WTF Ford, why not just toss in the 5.4 that they ALREADY HAVE and that people already swap in. Why is it so hard to do something simple that people will be happy about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGRE Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 The last thing the modular motor needs is more stroke. the dimensions are roughly 3.55" x 3.55" compared to the 5.0 4" x 3" I understand the longer stroke is so make more torque out of the smaller diplacement, but building HP in a smaller displacement engine means turning higher RPM, more RPM = more piston speed and less longevity. the 5.0 is actually dimensionally better equipt for higher rpm as far as bore/stroke ratio vs. the modular, it just doesn't have 4 valves to do it. The modular as we have it currently can't be bored much over .020 before needing re sleeved, if they would have used a OHC design and left the bore and stroke identical to the 5.0 we would be looking at a nasty N/A motor even with the 2 valve OHC heads. All this is also ignoring another aspect of the evil smaller bore V8. valve shrouding Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinner Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Knowing ford they will prolly stick with a bored 4.6 and remake they 5.0 but even then dont forget the twin turbo setups they are researching called the twin force... factory twin turbo v8 anyone? IF they really wanna do it right they and spend a bit more money, ford is devolping a BOSS series motor. The motor is a 6.2 liter v8 producing around 425 hp 425 torque. It will have the ability to be a 7.0 liter aswell. It will be a sohc motor like the 4.6 but will possibly later have a high po dohc setup. They are testing a 650hp dohc twin turbo 6.2 aswell. BOSS series info THe TT setup you're referring to is ECOboost and will be a v-6 only from what I read. Also it am be going in the fusion first. But 450 hp and 300ish ft lbs are what they are saying so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schmuckingham Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 maybe it will be the 302 cammer. Parnelli jones FTMFW As stated before they should just use the iron 5.4 in mustangs with some decents heads instead of using 4.6 SOHC heads like in the F150's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 427 small block isn't really small unless you mean external size and weight. yep, small and light Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 78novaman Posted April 24, 2008 Report Share Posted April 24, 2008 I've heard there may be a smaller version of the Boss engine. They are supposed to be DOHC vs the current single, and direct injection should be standard??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest fist302 Posted April 24, 2008 Report Share Posted April 24, 2008 THe TT setup you're referring to is ECOboost and will be a v-6 only from what I read. Also it am be going in the fusion first. But 450 hp and 300ish ft lbs are what they are saying so far. Iv seen the TT v6 info but i was reffering to the v8 they are testing. "A "TwinForce" 6.2 L DOHC 4-valve, twin-turbo, GDI version of the Boss is being developed and has reportedly produced over 650 lb·ft (881 N·m) in testing, although there are no known plans time to install this engine in a production application". I would imagine they would consider using the TT v6 aswell in the next mustang. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.