BDHG940 Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 Im new with all the turbo stuff but 40hp per # of boost seems high. Im used to seeing lower displacement number (less than 7.0L). All of my cars seem like they maybe 20-25hp per # of boost. Impressive nonetheless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atomicfusion1647545515 Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Im new with all the turbo stuff but 40hp per # of boost seems high. Im used to seeing lower displacement number (less than 7.0L). All of my cars seem like they maybe 20-25hp per # of boost. Impressive nonetheless It is what it is... We are currently limited by a few parts... this winter those limits should be upgraded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattsv8 Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 wow im kinda suprised the 1.5s 60s arent as bad i i thought it was getting. i saw the vett at the white castle on broad looked good. has a great sound under boost Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRocket1647545505 Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Im new with all the turbo stuff but 40hp per # of boost seems high. Im used to seeing lower displacement number (less than 7.0L). All of my cars seem like they maybe 20-25hp per # of boost. Impressive nonetheless PSI means nothing. CFMs are where it's at. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.