supldys Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 http://ohiodailyblog.com/content/strickland-brown-and-coleman-denounce-mccain-robocall-smears First Colin Powell endorses obama because of McCain's negative campaigning. Now 3 elected officials find time in their day (obviously not too busy working on state and local issues) to denounce mccain's negative campaigning. Yet I come home to 1 flyer about Ayers being a terrorist and being friends with obama. and 5 DIFFERENT flyers about McCain voting against the violence against women act, against equal rights and pay for women, and even supporting violence against women. Are you kidding me?? He's the one with a woman on the ticket, and I haven't seen cindy with a black eye yet either, she must keep her mouth shut huh obama? And its no surprise that Biden helped write the VAWA and then it was overturned by the supreme court for being unconstitutional and violating privacy rights. Hey democrats, quit bitching about sticking to the issues, and stick to the F-ing issues. *obviously not all democrats (I agree with some) just the ones that don't even realize what they're doing* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
copperhead Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 I'm scared to open the mailbox anymore, nothing but bills and political bullshit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAOLE Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 Sure is funny that Powell endorses Obama then we learn he will be a top advisor. hmmm.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tractor Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 I"m not sure what all the dems are bitching about "mccains negative compaining." McCains a total bitch and WILL NOT attack obama. Especially where he's most vulnerable. I would totally not be suprised if McCain is working on obamas side to give him the election. I hate them both and words aren't enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 Look on those ads, they are not put out by either candidate, they are put out by organizations that have agendas..... (not approved by Obama or McCain) I find it awesome, 163 year old streak. Not even for Kennedy..... http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-chicago-tribune-endorsement,0,1371034.story?track=email-alert-breakingnews This endorsement makes some history for the Chicago Tribune. This is the first time the newspaper has endorsed the Democratic Party's nominee for president. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supldys Posted October 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 Look on those ads, they are not put out by either candidate, they are put out by organizations that have agendas..... (not approved by Obama or McCain) I find it awesome, 163 year old streak. Not even for Kennedy..... http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-chicago-tribune-endorsement,0,1371034.story?track=email-alert-breakingnews Oh come on, the only other democrat nominee from illinois was stevenson in the 50's, but who the heck was going to vote against eisenhower? He couldn't even win illinois in either election Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 Did you look at those ads again? "not endorsed by Obama" right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supldys Posted October 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2008 no I had already thrown them away, but i'm sure you're right. But thats more reason that people endorsing either candidate need to shut up when they don't know what they're talking about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.