AudiOn19s Posted November 26, 2008 Report Share Posted November 26, 2008 You make a very good point. Either I didn’t realize how "slow" the Gallardo is or I didn’t realize how fast the Zo6 is, but I was surprised that the Zo6 beat him so easily. Aren’t the lambos built for higher speeds? I think it's more the Gallardo is slower than it should be....at least at real highway speeds. Remember the Top Gear test of the "lightweight cars". The Aston sucked so we'll forget that one. BUT compare the Gallardo Superleggera to the GT3RS Gallardo: 520hp, 3400lbs GT3 RS: 415hp, 3250lbx Freeway pull was nearly a dead heat with the Gallardo just barely ahead. Didn't make sense in that test either but both show the Gallardo to be slower than it "should" be. Wouldn't keep me from buying one if I had the means though as I'm asbolutely enamored with the Gallardo for some reason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitrousbird Posted November 27, 2008 Report Share Posted November 27, 2008 Specs depend on the year. Assuming the Gallardo is a 08: 520 HP, 376 TQ Curb Weight 3,153lbs Z06: 505 HP, 470 TQ Curb Weight: 3162 That AWD must really suck up some power! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conesmasher Posted November 27, 2008 Report Share Posted November 27, 2008 Specs depend on the year. Assuming the Gallardo is a 08: 520 HP, 376 TQ Curb Weight 3,153lbs Z06: 505 HP, 470 TQ Curb Weight: 3162 That AWD must really suck up some power! From a roll for sure, but the race from a dig, would be totally different Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.