Casper Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/12/18/clinton.donations/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJ Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 The oil industry is cleaner than Auto's, Banking, Housing, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenny Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 I don't vote. Two reasons. First of all it's meaningless; this country was bought and sold a long time ago. The shit they shovel around every four years pfff doesn't mean a fucking thing. Secondly, I believe if you vote, you have no right to complain. People like to twist that around – they say, 'If you don't vote, you have no right to complain', but where's the logic in that? If you vote and you elect dishonest, incompetent people into office who screw everything up, you are responsible for what they have done. You caused the problem; you voted them in; you have no right to complain. I, on the other hand, who did not vote, who in fact did not even leave the house on election day, am in no way responsible for what these people have done and have every right to complain about the mess you created that I had nothing to do with. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRocket1647545505 Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 Miss George Carlin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brrcats Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 I don't vote. Two reasons. First of all it's meaningless; this country was bought and sold a long time ago. The shit they shovel around every four years pfff doesn't mean a fucking thing. Secondly, I believe if you vote, you have no right to complain. People like to twist that around – they say, 'If you don't vote, you have no right to complain', but where's the logic in that? If you vote and you elect dishonest, incompetent people into office who screw everything up, you are responsible for what they have done. You caused the problem; you voted them in; you have no right to complain. I, on the other hand, who did not vote, who in fact did not even leave the house on election day, am in no way responsible for what these people have done and have every right to complain about the mess you created that I had nothing to do with. Exactly what I think. I tell people this and they look at me funny. They are retards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
copperhead Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 Secondly, I believe if you vote, you have no right to complain. People like to twist that around – they say, 'If you don't vote, you have no right to complain', but where's the logic in that? If you vote and you elect dishonest, incompetent people into office who screw everything up, you are responsible for what they have done. What if you voted for the loser? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco-REX Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 What if you voted for the loser? You get to say "I told you so." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImUrOBGYN Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 The Clintons involvment in big oil and what most would consider "Republican-type" behind the scenes workings, has been pretty well-known for a long time. Do some research on the Clintons and their history. You may be suprised what you find. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeitgeist57 Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 That is the most I've seen Kenny type in a single post as far as I can remember. ...and he is right, to a degree... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Abuse Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/12/18/clinton.donations/index.html Are you retarded? They donated to his fucking charities, not to him. Get a clue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted December 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 Are you retarded? They donated to his fucking charities, not to him. Get a clue. You are either really naive, or joking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Abuse Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 You are either really naive, or joking. If I were joking, I'd have mentioned genitals. If I were naive, I would think that every contact was the foundation of corruption DESPITE the fact that he held no office and had no power. Seriously, he gave speeches and founded charities, what the hell was there to be gained by funding his charities? Are you going to go after Jimmy Carter next? God knows who might have donated to Habitat for Humanity!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted December 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 If I were joking, I'd have mentioned genitals. If I were naive, I would think that every contact was the foundation of corruption DESPITE the fact that he held no office and had no power. Seriously, he gave speeches and founded charities, what the hell was there to be gained by funding his charities? Are you going to go after Jimmy Carter next? God knows who might have donated to Habitat for Humanity!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
copperhead Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 If I were joking, I'd have mentioned genitals. If I were naive, I would think that every contact was the foundation of corruption DESPITE the fact that he held no office and had no power. Seriously, he gave speeches and founded charities, what the hell was there to be gained by funding his charities? Are you going to go after Jimmy Carter next? God knows who might have donated to Habitat for Humanity!? Is his personal presidential library seriously a charity? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Abuse Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 Is his personal presidential library seriously a charity? It's not personal, it's open to the public, contains a museum, and he doesn't live in it. I'd say yes. I still don't see the benefit of lining an Ex-Presidents pockets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lustalbert Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 It's not personal, it's open to the public, contains a museum, and he doesn't live in it. I'd say yes. I still don't see the benefit of lining an Ex-Presidents pockets. The sway they can have on curent elected officials, endorsements, photo ops, counsulting...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenny Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 That is the most I've seen Kenny type in a single post as far as I can remember. ...and he is right, to a degree... George Carlin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Abuse Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 The sway they can have on curent elected officials, endorsements, photo ops, counsulting...... Ehhh, usually a lobbiest is used for those kind of things, and they're more effective than an ousted president because half the lawmakers don't already hate them. Donating to the charities IS a political move, I'll give you that. It's done to make the world think you give a shit, while you rape them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.