ODoyle Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 pass a 20-question multiple choice test, take a five-hour training course This seems like a good idea,I may be wrong but if i was offered a training class with a test at the end i would take it. but it should only be needed once Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putty Posted February 28, 2009 Report Share Posted February 28, 2009 If that cheap ammo is wolf Ide rather pee on it! I'm wishing hell breaks loose and I have like 2000 Wolf rounds in mags in you bums run out of your prissy brass shit. I'd like to hear you crying for me to toss you a mag of Wolf, so you can take out the zombies. I'd say "fuck you, grab brass and go reload" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
street pilot Posted February 28, 2009 Report Share Posted February 28, 2009 I have like 3 local gun stores, all have stacks of 30 and 20 rd ar mags and ak mags at the the 15-30 dollar range. and I just picked up 500 rd cases of .223 for $125 and $135. And that is local stuff, not mail order. over the summer 500rd boxs of .223 was around $175 here. Brand? Location? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRocket1647545505 Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 A do wha? . . . . . Reid joins Pelosi in opposing ban revival By J. Taylor Rushing Posted: 02/26/09 10:17 PM [ET] Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) will join House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in opposing any effort to revive the 1994 assault-weapons ban, putting them on the opposite side of the Obama administration. Reid spokesman Jim Manley said the Nevada Democrat will preserve his traditional pro-gun rights voting record. "Sen. Reid would oppose an effort [to] reinstate the ban if the Senate were to vote on it in the future," Manley told The Hill in an e-mail late Thursday night. It was not immediately clear whether Reid would block the bill from the Senate, but his opposition casts serious doubt on its chances. Also, Manley noted that Reid voted against the ban in 1994 and again when it expired in 2004. Reid's stance joins him with Pelosi, who told reporters Thursday that the administration had not checked with her before Attorney General Eric Holder told reporters the administration would attempt to reinstate the ban. Pelosi gave a flat “no” when asked if she had spoken to Holder or any other administration officials about the issue. “On that score, I think we need to enforce the laws we have right now,” Pelosi said at her weekly news conference. “I think it's clear the Bush administration didn’t do that.” Outside of the dig at the recent Republican president, that phrase is the stock line of those who don’t want to pass new gun control laws, such as the National Rifle Association (NRA). Holder said during a press conference Wednesday in Phoenix that Obama had made reinstating the ban one of his campaign promises. "There are obviously a number of things that are — that have been taking up a substantial amount of his time, and so I’m not sure exactly what the sequencing will be," Holder said. "It is something, however, that we still think would be an appropriate thing to do." The news caught Capitol Hill by surprise, immediately pitting Democrats and Republicans against each other and even exposing deep divides among Democrats. A number of House Democrats lost their seats after being targeted by the NRA for voting for the 1994 ban. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schmuckingham Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 Wolf will never touch the bolt of my AR or handgun, only if I owned an AK would it have a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenny Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 CHANGE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRocket1647545505 Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 CHANGE I suspect trickery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1fast5gp Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 I suspect trickery. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
copperhead Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 I suspect trickery. I'm deeply suspicious. I don't trust those people. There's always the off chance though that they are just flat out scared of losing their seats for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRocket1647545505 Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 There's always the off chance though that they are just flat out scared of losing their seats for it. That's kind of what I'm hoping for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putty Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 Wolf will never touch the bolt of my AR or handgun, only if I owned an AK would it have a chance. Oh Waaaaa! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJ Posted March 2, 2009 Report Share Posted March 2, 2009 I'm deeply suspicious. I don't trust those people. There's always the off chance though that they are just flat out scared of losing their seats for it. I think this is the case. With the amount of seats lost because of 1994 + the recent Heller case, I don't think they want to even begin to touch this issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty2Hotty Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 I'm going to get crap for asking this, but why would a private citizen need an assult rifle? I'm looking for valid reasoning other than it's your constitutional right. I'm wondering why you feel the need to open your cock sucker in a thread you have no common knowledge on? I mean, aren't there some other forums you could go troll on, like women's fashion, or which butt plug fits your asshole perfectly? I'm looking for a valid reason, why you deem it necessary to put your 2 cents where it don't belong. They're only "assault rifles" if you assault someone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty2Hotty Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 2012 can't come fast enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schmuckingham Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Oh Waaaaa! Ill remember this when you post up why your AR has a Wolf casing jammed in the barrel and need it machined out and a new barrel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putty Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 forgive me, but I am having too hard of a time figuring out why the gun is able to eject a brass case any better than a steel case. I dont get it...I dont....the weights the same...the diameter is the same..the size is the same. Sorry....i dont get it. Yeah, I get the steel may over time destroy the bolt, but other than that....."dirty ammo"...now stuck...argh! Im lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJ Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 forgive me, but I am having too hard of a time figuring out why the gun is able to eject a brass case any better than a steel case. I dont get it...I dont....the weights the same...the diameter is the same..the size is the same. Sorry....i dont get it. Yeah, I get the steel may over time destroy the bolt, but other than that....."dirty ammo"...now stuck...argh! Im lost. Brass is more malleable than steel, therefore when the extractor grabs it, any imperfections will be more likely to mold to the extractor with brass vs steel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schmuckingham Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 forgive me, but I am having too hard of a time figuring out why the gun is able to eject a brass case any better than a steel case. I dont get it...I dont....the weights the same...the diameter is the same..the size is the same. Sorry....i dont get it. Yeah, I get the steel may over time destroy the bolt, but other than that....."dirty ammo"...now stuck...argh! Im lost. What LJ just said and the fact that wolf is laquered, that shit melts than make the case stick the barrel. Thus making the extractor springs work twice as hard, then weaken, then break. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillJoy Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Brass is more malleable than steel, therefore when the extractor grabs it, any imperfections will be more likely to mold to the extractor with brass vs steel. What LJ just said and the fact that wolf is laquered, that shit melts than make the case stick the barrel. Thus making the extractor springs work twice as hard, then weaken, then break. Pretty much. The Steel Cases will wear the chamber over time as well. The Brass is softer, so it take the abuse when it is used. Not always the case with Wolf. KillJoy PS - Anyone else check out Cope's Distrubiting for ammo? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87GT Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 2012 can't come fast enough. You better be running for President in 2012. Lower ammo prices and no bans! Plus make it in every state you can shoot a trespasser on your property legally. Federal law not state law :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.