Guest Removed Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 but GM should have tested it either way, and most stuff they knew was a issue, didnt stop them from delaying recall's or TSB's till they starting seeing the issue's at the dealer levels Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gillbot Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 Depends on how you look at it. If it's not your fault and won't hurt your bottom line, you let the parts fail and just keep sending them back. I work for an OEM so we deal with this a lot. It sucks to have customers and downtime but if it doesn't cost US anything in the long run, why put in the extra effort? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Removed Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 well look at where they are now? failing. and i would get into more detail on this, but im sure it could somehow be turned around...if you want to talk about this more in depth..pm me on it. i used to work for gm..and i have seen things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gillbot Posted May 31, 2009 Report Share Posted May 31, 2009 well look at where they are now? failing. and i would get into more detail on this, but im sure it could somehow be turned around...if you want to talk about this more in depth..pm me on it. i used to work for gm..and i have seen things. Same here, I now work for a supplier. I've seen both sides of the coin. GM's failure has less to do with outsourced parts and more to internal issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.