evan9381 Posted September 24, 2012 Report Share Posted September 24, 2012 Most cyclists now-a-days ride in groups and at least one is always packing...Careful what you wish for. Good to see they got that guy and ticketed him! :gabe: Sold my PF9 and bought my LCP for the fact its super tiny and light weight and fits in my back jersey pocket no problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffro Posted September 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2012 :gabe: Sold my PF9 and bought my LCP for the fact its super tiny and light weight and fits in my back jersey pocket no problem. the PF9 and the LCP are nearly exactly the same size... The PF9 is actually a hair thinner... The LC9 might be slightly more reliable, the size argument is invalid. I took this photo about 2 months ago http://i.imgur.com/3qml5.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Nice Posted September 24, 2012 Report Share Posted September 24, 2012 Next time you see a cyclist on a two lane road and aren't going too fast try this. 1. Make a regular "bird" 2. Show them the "bird" palm forward and move side to side slowly like a wave. 3. ????? 4. Profit (they will wave back at you and you just gave them the bird, lol). Real life trolling ftw. :gabe: "Trolling". :dumb: Most cyclists now-a-days ride in groups and at least one is always packing...Careful what you wish for. :gabe: Sold my PF9 and bought my LCP for the fact its super tiny and light weight and fits in my back jersey pocket no problem. Good. Thumbs up man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evan9381 Posted September 24, 2012 Report Share Posted September 24, 2012 PF9 length 5.85 Height 4.3 width .88 Ruger LCP Length 5.16 Height 3.6 Width .82 From my quick online search - Pf9 loaded is 18.1oz, LCP is 11.95, which is about what my kitchen scale showed. So is it an enormous difference? No. But its a bit smaller all around, and weighs 1/3 less than the pf9. When its in my back jersey pocket with little support, i want it light as possible to not sag down and sway around as much as possible 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffro Posted September 24, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 24, 2012 PF9 length 5.85 Height 4.3 width .88 Ruger LCP Length 5.16 Height 3.6 Width .82 From my quick online search - Pf9 loaded is 18.1oz, LCP is 11.95, which is about what my kitchen scale showed. So is it an enormous difference? No. But its a bit smaller all around, and weighs 1/3 less than the pf9. When its in my back jersey pocket with little support, i want it light as possible to not sag down and sway around as much as possible damn. When i was holding both my loaded pf9 felt considerably lighter than the empty lc9. perception is a hell of a thing. Cheers to you for finding the official specs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evan9381 Posted September 24, 2012 Report Share Posted September 24, 2012 damn. When i was holding both my loaded pf9 felt considerably lighter than the empty lc9. perception is a hell of a thing. Cheers to you for finding the official specs. I tried to +rep you but i cant. IOU 1 +rep http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lQmrqf0qJUY/TgP4qW1p7zI/AAAAAAAAChQ/XI1-mGlgWtI/s1600/thats+a+car.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.