Nickey4271647545519 Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 from autoblog HE McLAREN P1™ ADOPTS TWIN POWER TO DELIVER PHENOMENAL TORQUE, INSTANTLY Feb 20, 2013 IPAS (Instant Power Assist System) and DRS (Drag Reduction System) offer instant boost of power and straight-line speed 916PS (903 bhp) and 900Nm, with emissions of less than 200g/km Substantially revised 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine coupled to low-weight, highly efficient electric motor ensures instant torque for optimised throttle response Full E-mode offers in excess of 10km emission-free driving The McLaren P1™ will have the combined force of two highly-efficient powerplants, offering the optimum mix of superb throttle response, day-to-day drivability and top speed. A mid-mounted 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine and a highly effective electric motor give a combined output of 916PS (903 bhp) and a maximum torque figure of 900Nm, ensuring instantaneous throttle response through the rev range, more akin to a naturally aspirated engine. Emissions of less than 200g/km on the combined cycle are reduced to zero in full electric drive mode, while the Formula 1-derived DRS and IPAS technologies offer an increase in straight-line speed and an instant boost of power. The 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine in the McLaren P1™ is a new version of the familiar M838T unit, that has been significantly upgraded to optimise cooling and durability under the higher loads. The engine block has a unique casting to incorporate the electric motor. The petrol engine produces 737PS (727 bhp) at 7,500rpm, and 720Nm of torque from 4,000rpm. To optimise efficiency of the petrol engine, extensive testing and development work has always been carried out with McLaren Automotive technology partner Mobil 1 on lubrication and hydraulic fluids. The lightweight electric motor, developed by the McLaren Electronics arm of the Group, produces 179PS (176 bhp), and is unique to the McLaren P1™. The motor produces maximum torque of 260Nm instantly from a standstill, greatly increasing the throttle response of the McLaren P1™, and peak combined torque of 900Nm is delivered from just 4,000 rpm. In addition to this, the McLaren-developed 'boost' system, IPAS, provides up to 179PS instantly. The instant response of the electric motor provides a sharper throttle response more associated with a normally aspirated engine, and the significantly enhanced air-charging system enables the McLaren P1™ to have more top-end power – the perfect combination for high performance. The electric motor is mounted directly onto the engine, and all drive is channelled through the dual-clutch seven-speed gearbox to drive the rear wheels. Thus, the electric motor and 3.8-litre twin-turbo V8 petrol engine work seamlessly together, providing more than just added ultimate power and torque. A further benefit is that the e-motor can provide faster upshifts. This is achieved through the application of instant negative torque at the point of shift, making the engine revs drop as quickly and efficiently as possible to the required engine speed for the upshift. In addition to the obsessive weight-saving measures demonstrated throughout the McLaren P1™, so too is the optimisation of usable energy. When off-throttle the electric motor provides additional drag torque, recovering energy to the battery that would otherwise be lost to the brakes. E-mode The McLaren P1™can be driven in a variety of modes, powered by the engine and electric motor together, or solely by the electric motor. This ensures versatility and ease of transportation, allows use in low emission zones and residential driving is optimised with near-silent running. Maximum power comes when using both powerplants together, but even in E-mode the performance is strong. E-mode is the most economical mode available with zero tailpipe emissions. In E-mode, the McLaren P1™ can travel more than 10km with electric-only power – enough for most city journeys. When the battery is empty, the petrol engine will automatically start to maintain drive and charge the battery. IPAS and DRS optimise performance and throttle response The power available via the petrol engine and electric motor is further enhanced on the McLaren P1™ through two steering wheel-mounted buttons which activate the DRS (Drag Reduction System) and IPAS (Instant Power Assist System). The Drag Reduction System used on the McLaren P1™ is a technology similar to that employed on Formula 1 cars. Speed is increased by reducing the amount of drag on the rear wing and, where the MP4-28 has a moveable flap on the rear wing, the McLaren P1™ has a wing that reduces in angle to lower drag by 23%. The system immediately deactivates when the button is released, or if the driver touches the brake pedal. IPAS is designed to deliver power rapidly for high performance acceleration, and provides 179PS of instant additional power. In developing the IPAS technology for the McLaren P1™, power delivery was prioritised over energy storage. This is achieved through a groundbreaking, lightweight battery pack, which offers greater power density than any other automotive battery pack on sale today. Battery The high power density has been achieved through a combination of high power cells, low pack weight and an innovative cooling system. The battery weighs just 96kg, and is mounted onto the underbody of the high-strength Formula 1-grade carbon fibre MonoCage chassis, which seals the unit in the vehicle, thus avoiding the added weight of any unnecessary battery packaging. Due to the amount of power being supplied by the battery, complex cooling is required to guarantee cell performance and reliability. The coolant flow is balanced so each cell is cooled to the same temperature across the entire pack. In addition to the battery being charged via the engine, the McLaren P1™ is also equipped with a plug-in charger which can recharge the battery, from empty, in only two hours. The plug-in charger can be stored in the luggage compartment, although the customer may choose to store it off-board – in a garage or the pits – to save weight. Further details of the McLaren P1™ will be released in the coming weeks, before the production-ready car makes its world debut at the Geneva Motor Show next month. http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/04-mclaren-p1-628.jpg http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/09/mclaren-p1-paris.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrendanB Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 This thing looks awesome, and personally I hope it eats the new Ferrari F150 up in every area. Car looks amazing, and apparently it's going to be one of the quickest road cars ever around certain tracks like Spa, Silverstone, etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Got-Boost? Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 LOVE the car just not onboard with the "hybrid" thing just yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noobiemcnooberson. Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Nobody said just because its a hybrid, it has to be slow. I think this car should be a prime example of that. If we can get the cost of the batteries down and the weight down to a reasonable level I'm all for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Das Borgen Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 I find it rather funny and downright hyppocritical that the new NSX gets blasted for intending to use a hybrid drivetrain for the most part while it's the complete opposite for this Mclaren P1 (and the Ferrari Enzo successor) just my observation......Some people are always so resistant to inevitable change, selectively Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noobiemcnooberson. Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 I'm interested in the Nsx as well, but Honda hasn't even built the factory to build them yet. The performance numbers of the mcclaren are more impressive than the Nsx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrendanB Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 I'm interested in the Nsx as well, but Honda hasn't even built the factory to build them yet. The performance numbers of the mcclaren are more impressive than the Nsx. It would be cool if the NSX somehow had a stick option with the dual-clutch, keep it true to it's roots almost, especially since it'll be a "lesser" supercar than the P1, F150, etc, although it does look promising, and it's cool it'll be built in Ohio of all places Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirks5oh Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 i want one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not Brian Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 Nobody said just because its a hybrid, it has to be slow. Not with a twin turbo V8 mated to the battery :dumb: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripleskate Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 I find it rather funny and downright hyppocritical that the new NSX gets blasted for intending to use a hybrid drivetrain for the most part while it's the complete opposite for this Mclaren P1 (and the Ferrari Enzo successor) just my observation......Some people are always so resistant to inevitable change, selectively Don't worry, I don't like it in either of them. I would rather have an original NSX or McLaren F1 (LM). Looks cool, but I have no aspiration to possess one. Perhaps I'm jaded, but all of the technology is a turn off, and in no way gives me a desire to even aspire to maybe one day driving one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koolrayz Posted February 21, 2013 Report Share Posted February 21, 2013 The instant torque of the electric motors are the wave of the future in performance automobiles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Got-Boost? Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Nobody said just because its a hybrid, it has to be slow. I think this car should be a prime example of that. If we can get the cost of the batteries down and the weight down to a reasonable level I'm all for it. Never said that, just not a "hybrid" fan YET based on the stuff I've seen. Also, I think long run the entire energy crisis/planet eco status is going to be worse with all these batteries long term....but just my opinion... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Das Borgen Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Never said that, just not a "hybrid" fan YET based on the stuff I've seen. Also, I think long run the entire energy crisis/planet eco status is going to be worse with all these batteries long term....but just my opinion... I think it's a very very valid concern and all too problematic that this concern rarely gets brought up, let alone addressed. Hopefully battery technology will evolve to the point where recyclability of old batteries will fix that problem....I haven't done enough research on this matter to speak intelligently about it so I won't argue the point for/against with any fervor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybe Posted February 22, 2013 Report Share Posted February 22, 2013 Never said that, just not a "hybrid" fan YET based on the stuff I've seen. Also, I think long run the entire energy crisis/planet eco status is going to be worse with all these batteries long term....but just my opinion... ^ +1. hazardous waste, even tool & die / manufacturing, plus we still generate energy the ugly way to charge the damn things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noobiemcnooberson. Posted February 23, 2013 Report Share Posted February 23, 2013 (edited) I agree with the cost of production and long term effects you guys have presented, however that is unfortunately how progress will be made. If hybrid technology isn't a viable option for the mainstream market, then the funding won't be there to continue to develop large capacity high voltage bAttery technology. Edited February 23, 2013 by h22eg6sir Fat fingers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Got-Boost? Posted February 25, 2013 Report Share Posted February 25, 2013 ^ +1. hazardous waste, even tool & die / manufacturing, plus we still generate energy the ugly way to charge the damn things. My main point on the entire thing. IMO, until we make BIG advances in wind, water, solar power....it still takes a nasty form to charge the batteries. Pretty hypocritical that the government wants hybrid cars but the EPA won't allow the batteries, parts, etc. to even be produced here because of eco issues. But it's okay to outsource it to China or somewhere else.... ...the other issue is once less gas is used the tax revenue will fall. So now they are looking at charging people per-miles traveled. If it's not one thing it's the next big idea... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallard Posted February 25, 2013 Report Share Posted February 25, 2013 Well, the government wants higher fleet MPG, which the industry has attacked by going to hybrids. However, anything can be used to store energy, whether it's compressed air, springs, flywheels, a battery, hydraulic accumulators, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.