copperhead Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/07/turning-point-ohio-judge-rules-speed-cameras-violate-rights/ By Judson Berger Published March 07, 2013 | FoxNews.com Highway speed cameras just got ticketed. An Ohio judge ruled Thursday that a Cincinnati-area community's speed cameras violate drivers' rights under the state constitution, in what attorneys on the case called a first-ever ruling against the ubiquitous enforcement tool. "To the best of my knowledge this is the first time in the country that this has happened," attorney Mike Allen, whose firm brought the case, told FoxNews.com. "This could be a major turning point for people that are aggrieved by these kind of things." There have been a handful of rulings in recent years against red-light cameras, but Allen said he believes this is a first for speed cameras. Hamilton County Judge Robert Ruehlman's emphatic and colorful decision was adorned with capital letters, bold print and exclamation points. In it, he said two speed cameras in the village of Elmwood Place, which were installed last year and caused considerable controversy in the community, violated drivers' "due process guarantees" under the Ohio Constitution. "Elmwood Place is engaged in nothing more than a high-tech game of 3 CARD MONTY," Ruehlman wrote. "It is a scam that the motorists can't win." He wrote in his opinion that even when drivers request a hearing to contest the $105 fines, "the hearing is nothing more than a sham!" The judge said any driver who comes in for a hearing will effectively have to argue against a written report "produced by the company that owns the speed monitoring unit." There is no ability to cross examine, Ruehlman wrote, while stressing the financial stake the company has in the tickets. A call to the main office for Elmwood Place was not returned, but Allen said he expects the village to appeal. Village officials first approved the speed cameras last July, and they were installed in September. The system has since issued thousands of $105 tickets -- the company controlling the cameras gets 40 percent of the revenue, while the rest goes to the village. As with speed cameras in towns and cities across the country, residents complained that they were just a money-making scheme for the local government. Further, businesses complained that people were avoiding the area -- and they were losing customers -- because the drivers didn't want to be ticketed. Interviewed last year, Elmwood Place Police Chief William Peskin told FOX19 that the cameras were installed for public safety. "I don't have the manpower to do that. I simply don't," Peskin said of traffic enforcement. "These cameras allow me to address other public safety needs." The decision comes as other jurisdictions weigh whether to keep enforcement cameras. In Florida, lawmakers are considering whether to scrap the state's red-light cameras, just two years after they were legalized. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/07/turning-point-ohio-judge-rules-speed-cameras-violate-rights/print#ixzz2MuXUOpae Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lag wagon Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Good news But at the risk of sounding tinfoil paranoid... These cameras allow me to address other public safety needs. From the beginning I said these are not about mailing out some speeding tickets The common use of them may be ruled unconstitutional, but have you ever seen a camera removed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ry_Trapp01647545522 Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 wow, it's taken this long for a judge to say that this violates due process? better now than never. The common use of them may be ruled unconstitutional, but have you ever seen a camera removed? yea, all over. they didn't last long in heath at all. exercise your google skills, they've been banned and ripped off their poles all over the country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturg1647545502 Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 so this means i get a refund on that red light right hand turn i California rolled at 545am? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forrest Gump 9 Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Thank god!! I guess I don't have to exercise my right after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.