jeffro Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 hue http://i.imgur.com/odpkI2l.jpg PS, the following tells us nothing... " However, experts are probing deeper into the footprint of the homemade simulator, which he had at his home in Shah Alam." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallard Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 It was also said that the plane could have been flying on autopilot, turning at preprogrammed GPS points, and it would take an experienced pilot to do this. So the question is: was the pilot at the helm the whole time, or did he program the autopilot and either kill himself or leave the cockpit. Or maybe he was trying to fly towards Australia in order to seek asylum, but ran out of fuel. My final theory is that he flew the plane low to avoid radar and the plane is on the ground somewhere being outfitted for a more sinister plan. But this is looking like less and less of a possibility, given the highly conflicted air space he would have to fly through. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 hue http://i.imgur.com/odpkI2l.jpg PS, the following tells us nothing... Jesus. If that's true, that is pretty suspicious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallard Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 Jesus. If that's true, that is pretty suspicious. There were something like 16 Freescale employees on that plane. Also, not sure how Freescale does it, but a lot of companies pay patent holders a flat fee and you never receive royalties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 There were something like 16 Freescale employees on that plane. What is the patent for? Do we know? Did I just miss it in the original quote? I assume it's something semiconductor related (duh)... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallard Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 What is the patent for? Do we know? Did I just miss it in the original quote? I assume it's something semiconductor related (duh)... "System for optimizing number of dies produced on a wafer" US 8671381 B1 Filed in Dec 2012, published March 11, 2014. See my edit above though. Freescale owns the patent, I seriously doubt these guys saw more than $1000 pat on the back, and they weren't going to get royalties (most likely) Since they are Freescale employees. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 I'm no conspiracy theorist, so don;t hear me saying "Blackstone did it", it's just pretty coincidental. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallard Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 If the company wanted to kill them for this patent, they would have done so after it was filed, not waited for approval. Plus Freescale is already the assignee of the patent, these folks are just listed as inventors. Based on what I see in my industry (and my wife's ~6+ patents) Freescale would have nothing to gain by killing them, as they probably just earn a flat fee as a bonus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airwg2189 Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 Yeah that seems incredibly risky and quite a hefty heist to pull off for sole ownership of a royalty-free patent for optimizing the number of dies on a wafer... Interesting as fuck though, good info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supplicium Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 blackstone stole the plane took it to a chop shop in africa, repainted and sold it for 200mill kinda like in GTA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRed05 Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 blackstone stole the plane took it to a chop shop in africa, repainted and sold it for 200mill kinda like in GTA This might sound funny, but if you know anything about Africa, then you know that the following scene is one of the most accurate depictions of something that can happen Africa that you've ever seen in a movie. Someone is driving around in Zimbabwe with a "Boeing" emblem on his Toyota Hiace as we speak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Nice Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 It was also said that the plane could have been flying on autopilot, turning at preprogrammed GPS points, and it would take an experienced pilot to do this. So the question is: was the pilot at the helm the whole time, or did he program the autopilot and either kill himself or leave the cockpit. Or maybe he was trying to fly towards Australia in order to seek asylum, but ran out of fuel. So everyone is talking about how experienced this guy is. Does it make sense he wouldn't know the distance he could travel on the amount of fuel he had? Not trying to be a cock. Just doesn't make sense for him to be so brilliant then go, "Whoops, out of fuel!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stretch Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Interesting read... http://keithledgerwood.tumblr.com/post/79838944823/did-malaysian-airlines-370-disappear-using-sia68-sq68 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nurkvinny Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 So, this pilot has, let's say, strong political and religious ties (yes, MUCH more fanatical than normal). He attends an opposition leader's trial a few hours before the flight. His home is searched the day of the incident, only to learn his wife and 3 kids were moved out the day before the flight. Walks like a duck... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fubar231 Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Interesting read... http://keithledgerwood.tumblr.com/post/79838944823/did-malaysian-airlines-370-disappear-using-sia68-sq68 Very interesting... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallard Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 So everyone is talking about how experienced this guy is. Does it make sense he wouldn't know the distance he could travel on the amount of fuel he had? Not trying to be a cock. Just doesn't make sense for him to be so brilliant then go, "Whoops, out of fuel!" True, although flying at lower altitude will increase fuel consumption, but it would still be a gross miscalculation on his part. I considered this a possibility because he had just watched his friend get sent to jail over allegedly being gay and maybe he thought they would be coming for him so he would seek shelter in a liberal nation. I still think this is unlikely because usually when a pilot seeks asylum they don't go through all the trouble of avoiding radar, but I don't know why else he would take the southern route. If it was suicide there's no need to keep the plane in the air for 7+ hours. Interesting read... http://keithledgerwood.tumblr.com/post/79838944823/did-malaysian-airlines-370-disappear-using-sia68-sq68 That is interesting and something I had seen mentioned in other articles, though not in this much depth. This seems pretty likely in my head, due to the amount of planning involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuicedH22 Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 hue http://i.imgur.com/odpkI2l.jpg PS, the following tells us nothing... Let me just clear this retardedness up real quick.... What made me know it was yet another dumbasses personal conspiracy theory, is that, like most dumbasses, they dont know how the world works, so they make it up in their mind and sell it as fact to the ignorant. And that was the most basic fact around the patent.... When a patent is filed by a corporation, the inventors of the invention do not get royalties or great riches from it. If you file a patent, as an inventor, for a corporation, the corporation OWNS the patent and you are little more than the inventor, and the corporation "might" give you some small prize money for your patent. Most large corporations make employees sign their patent rights away, from the standpoint if they come up with any inventions that they patent, that they got hte knowledge of from their job, the company owns that patent as well. So hte basic premise of this conspiracy is asinine. Also, for future reference, when something like this comes out and says "spread this as fast as possible" (sense of urgency)... chances are it is fake and they just want their lie to go viral. And if you dont believe that, but believe snopes... here you go: http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/malaysiapatent.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffro Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Let me just clear this retardedness up real quick.... What made me know it was yet another dumbasses personal conspiracy theory, is that, like most dumbasses, they dont know how the world works, so they make it up in their mind and sell it as fact to the ignorant. And that was the most basic fact around the patent.... When a patent is filed by a corporation, the inventors of the invention do not get royalties or great riches from it. If you file a patent, as an inventor, for a corporation, the corporation OWNS the patent and you are little more than the inventor, and the corporation "might" give you some small prize money for your patent. Most large corporations make employees sign their patent rights away, from the standpoint if they come up with any inventions that they patent, that they got hte knowledge of from their job, the company owns that patent as well. So hte basic premise of this conspiracy is asinine. Also, for future reference, when something like this comes out and says "spread this as fast as possible" (sense of urgency)... chances are it is fake and they just want their lie to go viral. And if you dont believe that, but believe snopes... here you go: http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/malaysiapatent.asp :gabe: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JuicedH22 Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 yea, after I posted I realized there were like 10 posts before me saying basically the same thing, lolol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverAudiMike Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Let me just clear this retardedness up real quick.... What made me know it was yet another dumbasses personal conspiracy theory, is that, like most dumbasses, they dont know how the world works, so they make it up in their mind and sell it as fact to the ignorant. And that was the most basic fact around the patent.... When a patent is filed by a corporation, the inventors of the invention do not get royalties or great riches from it. If you file a patent, as an inventor, for a corporation, the corporation OWNS the patent and you are little more than the inventor, and the corporation "might" give you some small prize money for your patent. Most large corporations make employees sign their patent rights away, from the standpoint if they come up with any inventions that they patent, that they got hte knowledge of from their job, the company owns that patent as well. So hte basic premise of this conspiracy is asinine. Also, for future reference, when something like this comes out and says "spread this as fast as possible" (sense of urgency)... chances are it is fake and they just want their lie to go viral. And if you dont believe that, but believe snopes... here you go: http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/malaysiapatent.asp I have family that was directly involved in the design of both the IBM POS bar code scanner (think grocery stores), and the GP automatic paper towel dispenser, and can concur. PS don't hate me if you've ever had to punch the dispenser to get it to work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallard Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Or there's the simple answer, though not sure it explains turning north. http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macpyro2 Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Interesting read... http://keithledgerwood.tumblr.com/post/79838944823/did-malaysian-airlines-370-disappear-using-sia68-sq68 This is about the best thing I have read regarding this incident. A lot of the "news" reports I have seen make no sense at all, usually void of any logic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRed05 Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Or there's the simple answer, though not sure it explains turning north. http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/ I like to agree with this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTQ B4U Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 (edited) I like to agree with this one. I'm okay with it but can't give too much credibility to a guy who couldn't even Google the AirCanada DC9 incident of 1983 to get the details of his story accurate. He's recanted some of it too. http://flightclub.jalopnik.com/a-problem-with-the-malaysia-airlines-flight-370-fire-th-1546500628/@flyingphotog Edited March 18, 2014 by TTQ B4U Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverMaker Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 Or there's the simple answer, though not sure it explains turning north. http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh370-electrical-fire/ Good read. I do love reading all the conspiracy stuff though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.