DangBruhY Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 It's Bushs fault! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disclaimer Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 While we're discussing hypocrisy...http://www.politicususa.com/Daily-Show-RNCThere's a video in the link if you want to see the segment, it's much more amusing that way.On Tuesday’s The Daily Show, John Oliver followed Republicans to the RNC winter meeting in Hawaii, where they continued to talk about fiscal responsibility while enjoying an expensive Hawaiian getaway. The point was that when Obama goes to Hawaii, to the GOP he is an elitist, but the RNC sees no irony in their own behavior.Oliver talked to several Republicans who utter the same talking point that Democrats are out of touch with average Americans, while they lounged around in Hawaii. One meeting attendee claimed that Democrats can’t connect with people because, “They’re more well to do. They had the money to go to Harvard and that kind of thing.”Later in the segment, Oliver said, “It was basic common sense. In the middle of the recession don’t waste money on programs that we don’t need, can’t afford, or simply look ridiculous,” all the while the video showed him lounging at the resort.” As usual, the comedic Daily Show was the only program to point out the sheer absurdity of the Republican Party trying to score political points, by talking about Democrats being out of touch with the common man, and fiscal responsibility, from Hawaii where they decided to hold their winter meeting in the middle of a recession. The worst part about it is that the members of the RNC seemed completely clueless. They talk about Democrats being elitist, but fail to realize that even in good times, average Americans can’t afford a getaway to Hawaii. If Republicans are serious about fiscal responsibility, they could set an example for the rest of America, but holding their winter meeting in Pittsburgh or Cleveland instead of Hawaii. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InyaAzz Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 So...both sides waste money. That's nothing new. Which side is calling the other side out on it? Both? One? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disclaimer Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) http://www.businessinsider.com/nancy-pelosis-in-flight-food-and-drink-costs-101000-2010-1Hastert (R-previous speaker)' date=' flew MORE often.[url']http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/jet.asphttp://mediamatters.org/blog/201002010038Judicial Watch hides facts in attack on Pelosi flights February 01, 2010 5:52 pm ET by Terry Krepel Judicial Watch has received much attention from the usual right-wing outlets for its recent mini-report claiming that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi spent $2 million in taxpayer money on Air Force aircraft. The press release seems rather deliberately underwritten, suggesting that much, if not all, of that money was spent solely on Pelosi and her immediate family -- for example, their press release's headline states that Pelosi's "Military Travel Cost the United States Air Force $2,100,744.59 over a Two-Year Period." But the release later discloses that the data is actually for "103 Pelosi-led congressional delegations" -- i.e., the congressional delegations set up through the Speaker's office, many of which included other members of Congress as well -- not her personal travel. WorldNetDaily, for one, took that bait. Judicial Watch is also completely silent about the passenger lists for these CODELs -- perhaps because some of them include Republican members of Congress and their spouses. For instance, Judicial Watch highlighted a May 2008 CODEL to Israel and Baghdad that "included members of Congress and their spouses and cost $17,931 per hour in aircraft alone," as well as a copious stash of alcoholic beverages. Unmentioned by Judicial Watch was that Republican Reps. David Dreier and Adam Putnam were also on that trip (Republican Leader John Boehner was originally scheduled to go as well but later withdrew). Republican members also brought their spouses on Pelosi-led delegations to Europe in 2007 and Europe and India in 2008. In highlighting how some of these Pelosi-related trips "included members of the House Speaker's family," Judicial Watch curiously fails to mention that family members traveling on Air Force aircraft are generally required to reimburse the government for the cost of flights and food, paying the price of a coach ticket on a commercial airline. Indeed, the authorizations from Pelosi's office for members of her family to travel on CODELs make clear that the "[t]ravel is on a reimbursable basis." Also glossed over: Pelosi's predecessor as House speaker, Republican Dennis Hastert, also authorized members to bring family members on CODELs. Indeed, the Freedom of Information Act documents Judicial Watch posted to support its attack on Pelosi bear this out -- for instance, a request by Hastert for a 2006 CODEL to Greece, India, and Vietnam shows that of the congressmen going on the trip, all but one were Republican, and all but one brought their wives, including Hastert himself. Even though Republican Hastert arranged and went on junket-esque CODELs, and even though Republicans were on numerous CODELs arranged by Pelosi, Judicial Watch sees fit to bash only Pelosi. This appears to be nothing more than the latest round of smearing Pelosi as a prolific abuser of the House speaker's travel privileges. That falsehood-laden accusation was debunked. So, what's your point? That's a tit-for-tat on that issue. Doesn't address the critiques in the DailyShow Edited February 11, 2010 by JRMMiii Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InyaAzz Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 All I know is Courvoisier is a guilty pleasure of mine...I'd take on for the team if Pelosi would give me free cognac. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alienpi Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 What's my point? LoLoL... The point is both teams break the rules. Both teams are broken. Both teams are EQUALLY to blame.Both teams are controlled by the same corporations? Does this mean that the corporations are in charge? Do the corporations have the people's best interests in mind? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disclaimer Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 What's my point? LoLoL... The point is both teams break the rules. Both teams are broken. Both teams are EQUALLY to blame.No team broke the rules - everything is/was. I don't understand.I thought we were talking about being hypocritical and out of touch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.