kawi kid Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 (edited) Why are you worried about it? Is there a stigma attached to a certain brand or model that kills people? If you want a gun that doesn't kill people -- get a squirt gun.I didn't wanna have to hurry and buy one and I kinda wanted to buy one new. Kinda like intratec after the columbine shootings. Hard to get certain parts and pieces for a tec9 now.I think glock would fair better than the manufacturer if the fiveseven since the fort hood shooter used them also. I would almost look like strike two. Edited January 13, 2011 by kawi kid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disclaimer Posted January 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 I guess I don't understand that business model? People are in the business of making guns. Guns are a tool that have many purposes. Someone misuses your product and you decide you shouldn't make your product anymore?We're talking about Glock, not Four Loko. (Note: I also don't have a Tec9, so I dont' know the history on that, but it sounds dumb to close up shop because of some 'outliers' that misused their product) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disclaimer Posted January 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 Report: Its Going To Take Way More Than An Inconceivable Act Of Violence For Country To Rise Above Politics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawi kid Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 I think it opens up the door for law suits and that's what they run from. Like I said I think glock would fair better since its a bigger company towards civilian sales. F&h is bigger on the military side with the acr and some of their other models they produce for the military use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhaag Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 There's no semen on the bike.There might have been if I had the bike instead. "You couldn't hit the broad side of a Senator" would probably NOT be a very appropriate turn-of-phrase given the recent events.I dunno, it was more front to back so I think you're ok with the above. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReconRat Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 Who? Glock's not here, man...It's a little hard to sue Glock in the USAGLOCK Ges.m.b.H. P.O. Box 9 A-2232 Deutsch Wagram AUSTRIA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fusion Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 http://gawker.com/5732700/rush-limbaughs-tucson-billboard-is-just-perfect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawi kid Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 I enjoyed the comments. I bet 90% of the people posting have never listened to his show tho lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbot Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 i've listened to his show. he's a fucking tardass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawi kid Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 He's an arrogant fucker and that's the only reason I 'like' him. At least he doesn't cry all day like Glenn Beck.Yep lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beezer Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 Here's an idea. Let's say the nut job's love notes found in his safe said that Rush Limbaugh told him that these democrats had to go and targeted Gabby as the leader of the left wing commies trying to take over the country. And Palin came to him in a dream and said she would draw and quarter him like an Alaskan elk if he didn't go to try and kill Gabby and take as many others as he could with her. And he had logs detailing how he wouldn't leave the house when Rush was on. I say while that might be introduced as irrefuteable evidence that Laughner was nuts, it wouldn't make Rush or Palin any more responsible then the are now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chevysoldier Posted January 15, 2011 Report Share Posted January 15, 2011 I guess I don't understand that business model? People are in the business of making guns. Guns are a tool that have many purposes. Someone misuses your product and you decide you shouldn't make your product anymore?We're talking about Glock, not Four Loko. (Note: I also don't have a Tec9, so I dont' know the history on that, but it sounds dumb to close up shop because of some 'outliers' that misused their product)Intratec was basically sued and harrased enough by the gov't and forced to close. They didn't do it willingly. And in Reindeer Games he took a squirt gun with alcohol in it and sprayed a guy smoking a cigarette. Burned the guy to a crisp so your logic is flawed on that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cg2112 Posted January 16, 2011 Report Share Posted January 16, 2011 Rush Limbaugh really isn't all that bad.He's a typical Republican. Nothing he says is particularly extreme, and I've always found him to be fairly level headed (relative to other right wing talk show hosts, that is). I disagree with him on pretty much every issue, but of all of those pundits, he seems the most honest to me. Honesty, of course, being relative.The worst of the bunch, to me, are Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and Michael Savage. Hannity is the least honest, Glenn Beck is the most brainless, and Michael Savage is just an awful human being. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beezer Posted January 17, 2011 Report Share Posted January 17, 2011 http://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video;_ylt=A0S00M2czzRN6jAAjif7w8QF;_ylu=X3oDMTBrYXNma3Q1BHNlYwNzZWFyY2gEdnRpZANWMTE4?p=fuller+abc&fr=sfp&ei=utf-8&n=21&tnr=20This discussion started with a comment about whether Laughner was politically motivated. Well clearly this guy is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fusion Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 http://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video;_ylt=A0S00M2czzRN6jAAjif7w8QF;_ylu=X3oDMTBrYXNma3Q1BHNlYwNzZWFyY2gEdnRpZANWMTE4?p=fuller+abc&fr=sfp&ei=utf-8&n=21&tnr=20This discussion started with a comment about whether Laughner was politically motivated. Well clearly this guy is.The guy that was shot by Laughner and probably suffering from PTSD? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fusion Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 The father of the dead girl isn't pointing political fingers. Yes. Everything is black and white. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fusion Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 No' date=' apparently everything is left or right.[/quote']Only with you guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbot Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 yeah? well, only with your mom! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fusion Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 yeah? well, only with your mom!Well your mom first!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbot Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 damnation! i must spread rep around first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chevysoldier Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 I heard the guy who took down Loughner had his CHL. He contemplated drawing but was concerned for innocent bystanders and making sure her didn't shoot the wrong guy. He didn't even draw his weapon. I have not verified this information but found it interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fusion Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 I heard the guy who took down Loughner had his CHL. He contemplated drawing but was concerned for innocent bystanders and making sure her didn't shoot the wrong guy. He didn't even draw his weapon. I have not verified this information but found it interesting.I heard he had a dragon, but you know flames, chaos and all that... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disclaimer Posted January 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 I heard this is what he drove Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbot Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 i came 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorifto240 Posted January 18, 2011 Report Share Posted January 18, 2011 (edited) 5 Strangest Explanations for Jared Loughner's Attackhttp://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/5-Strangest-Explanations-for-Jared-Loughners-Attack-6511Wow. People are really stretching to use this for their agendas...That's an interesting take on it, Pot. I'll go find you a kettle.5 Strangest Explanations for Jared Loughner's Attackhttp://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/5-Strangest-Explanations-for-Jared-Loughners-Attack-6511Wow. People are really stretching to use this for their agendas...That's an interesting take on it, Pot. I'll go find you a kettle.I guess I don't understand that business model? People are in the business of making guns. Guns are a tool that have many purposes. Someone misuses your product and you decide you shouldn't make your product anymore?We're talking about Glock, not Four Loko. (Note: I also don't have a Tec9, so I dont' know the history on that, but it sounds dumb to close up shop because of some 'outliers' that misused their product)By your logic then, you can't really be mad at Republicans, nor should you have accused them of somehow being responsible for the shooting. The Republican Party has a product (a certain political ideology) that has many purposes, and on occasion a crazy can misuse a political ideology.It's not the gun company's fault when a crazy misuses a gun, but it is the Republicans fault when a crazy misuses their political ideology? Edited January 18, 2011 by dorifto240 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.