Anden Posted September 11, 2011 Report Share Posted September 11, 2011 Just like the title says. I'm doing my own research but your opinion is more than welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helmutt Posted September 11, 2011 Report Share Posted September 11, 2011 I'll school ya on the fact that I'm clueless to this technology I just got into the HD realm this year.......my last remote was made of oak and marble, lashed together with baling twine:D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStump Posted September 11, 2011 Report Share Posted September 11, 2011 (edited) My advise, don't get one. They are just big gimmicks and cost WAY too much. But if you insist on getting one, samsung makes the best IMO but lg is gonna be the cheapest because they now use passive glasses which are what they use in the movie theater. Edited September 11, 2011 by JStump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmh_sprint Posted September 11, 2011 Report Share Posted September 11, 2011 My advise, don't get one. They are just big gimmicks and cost WAY too much. But if yupou insist on getting one, samsung makes the best IMO but lg is gonna be the cheapest because they now use passive glasses which arewhat they use in the movie theater.+1. Don't waste the money or spend the money you'd spend on a 3D set and get a real good HD set. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flounder Posted September 11, 2011 Report Share Posted September 11, 2011 120 or 240 hz will do you right. 240 will cost more.Go with Active 3d vs passiveget LED.Samsung for the win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chevysoldier Posted September 11, 2011 Report Share Posted September 11, 2011 I'm waiting on the holographic televisions to come out.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anden Posted September 11, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2011 I have a good hd set. I will comment on the fact that what I can pick up over the air looks better than what time warner is sending through the cable. Other than that I do like the idea of passive 3d sets. We are a family of five and buying all those glasses is scary. But what I have seen so far with the active they can deliver a 2d image to those that 3d make feel ill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hollywood3586 Posted September 11, 2011 Report Share Posted September 11, 2011 Honestly I went with the LED over the 3D just because I got 60" for the price of a 50". But price wise the new toshiba 3D is wonderful. It looks fucking sweet, but sports is hard to watch. It converts all channels to 3D and it's really great quality. They also give you like 8 pairs of glasses which is sweet, and they aren't the battery operated ones. These are like the ones they give you in the theater but way better. Go check them out. Just don't talk to a salesman until you have seen your choices. Of course they are all bias and want you to spend $3000 with them. I got the 60" sharp Aquos full 1080p with full apps and web capability and I got it for $1200. Just make sure you do research. TVs are fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tpoppa Posted September 11, 2011 Report Share Posted September 11, 2011 I would NOT buy 3d now. There isn't much media available. Plus, the 3d TVs that will come out in the next year or 2 will me much better and cheaper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.