Leaderboard

She's fine as long as she can put up with us.

I hear McDonalds is pretty tasty

I sleep pretty well, but sitting all day on my fat wallet stuffed with huge amounts of cash gives me sciatic pain in my right leg….

Then there's the really old lady who swears by Dr. Pepper and chocolate. My guess would be genetics and don't get fat.

This would be the biggest issue.

In 100% of the deaths I have been on none had a bowl of high fiber cereal anywhere near the body so they may be onto something here. Coincidence

So a solid 2" ?

The 9th and 10th are out for Brian, he'll be in Mexico mingling with his people. I cannot speak for any other dates, but I know he doesn't frequent the forum much anymore.

I took the bait and read the most recent comments. Seems to be a typical debate about general 'gun control' issues rather than much factual debate about any of the changes in the law. The only thing I don't like is the reduction in training hours to receive a permit to carry. Hear me out on this... 1) I think it's a good PR move to require more training whenever possible. 2) some people legitimately need more training before they can safely carry a firearm. I'm including myself in that group. It's not that I feel as though I would be reckless or unsafe, but I have relatively little handgun experience, and I want to be CONFIDENT in my abilities before carrying a loaded firearm in public. To use a motorcycle metaphor, I would rather learn on a 250 and get comfortable on that before just streeting a 1000 from day 1. It's not that I don't know how to use the 1000, but I'm far from "comfortable" with it. I personally have the self-control to resist carrying a loaded weapon until I work through the process of safely handling it without barrel-sweeping bystanders or being a dumbass with securing it in my vehicle when it's not allowed in an establishment, etc. - I do not trust everyone to be as vigilant as I am. That said, I also feel there should be a (strict) way to opt-out of the entire 8-hour (or 12-hour) training requirement. Some sort of skills test that would allow experienced shooters to demonstrate a mastery of safety and accuracy. This would need to be legitimately tough, or it would become a joke. And the people administering the test would have to maintain their integrity and not just pass their buddies who don't want to take the classes. /rant. Overall, a pretty positive legislative change.