I did a little research on this topic to answer some of your questions. In the state's eye this is considered sexual abuse. Making no effort to prevent child from observing sexual behavior; Disseminating or showing a child photographs, video and/or any pornographic material; Allowing/forcing child to view pornographic material; Photographing, videotaping and/or viewing child without clothing or partially clothed; Allowing child to be photographed, videotaped and/or viewed without clothing or partially clothed; Sexual activity between any child thirteen years of age or younger and any person(s) more than four years older in age. (this is a double rule, being if you are 20 you can't scrump at 16 yr old because of 4yrs difference) Here is where it gets tricky, this is not considered sexual abuse. Child sixteen years and older engaging in consensual contact with a non-related person(s) over the age of sixteen. Clear as mud isn't it??? Now the only question would be what they consider pornography.