Science Abuse

Kid shooting dad: I hope the kid is ok, he got nailed in the face.

This is a fun holiday if you've got kids: http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/7766/copyofnicktk0.jpg http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/2905/copyofpunkinpv2.jpgI triedhttp://www.mikecs.net/prodigeek/images/7greatestalieninvasions_AA8E/mars_attacks.jpg

Are you kidding me?

Wow these guys suck at life in every respect. No doubt there's people out there who want to do this, I'd like to see if this was actually a credible threat, because it seems like a damned stupid plan.

Cool. Care to quote me something from Obamas plan that says that will happen? Seriously, I'd like to see it because I've not come across anything like that. What you're referring to is this: -An add claimed that his plan would lower taxes, by bracket, for 90~% of Americans -It was noted that 40% of Americans don't pay taxes. Pundit logic? OMG HOW KAN TAXES BE LOWER THAN ZERO THEY MUST WANT TO GIVE THEM ALL MONEEZ. Couldn't be that the 90% was an oversimplification. No, I don't mean tapping some pundit's blog where he interprets something as meaning something. Show me some code.

I never said anything about newsworthy, just not court-worthy. Here's more on the redistribution of weath: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8EyGpOU3qM

...doing your own dirty work. http://www.myfoxkc.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail;jsessionid=EDB75A79EE19C8B4329C16AD4365926B?contentId=7729048&version=3&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=1.1.1&sflg=1

.... and? Where did I mention a supermajority? lastly, i don;t think you'll see any activity on any of those fronts because no one in this country wants to bring that kind of wrath down upon themselves. "Taking" of guns and banning them all outright will receive absolutely no support from anyone who matters, period, ever. Nationwide banning of all abortions will never happen until a viable alternative is given. Why don't we just mandate tube-tying and vasectomies for the two parties involved in created a life that they want aborted? "Want one? It'll cost you". I'd like to see a statisic of repeat customers at clinics.

What you guys are missing is context, because McCain did the same shit, but directed at your side. In 2000, McCain pissed off ultra-right christians by taking a stand, and I loved him for it. To prepare for his prez-bid, he had to patch things up, and he when crawlin' down south to kiss Falwells ass. Barry, to shake the image of "White Man in black clothing" that was given to him by his opponents, had to do something to the far left on his side. It exposes nothing deep, but rather the shallow, easily shed "hats" that a candidate will put on to get support from their parties "base". This does show how desperately the RNC is digging to find stuff on him. How do you find a recording of an obscure radio bit aired 7 years ago? You try really really hard. That being said, what a dumbfuck choice of words. Even if he did mean anything Lenin-like, it doesn't bother me because he cant do it. I think I've come up with a bumper sticker suitable for my car: NO PRESIDENT ALONE CAN TAKE YOUR GUNS NO PRESIDENT CAN STOP ABORTION BY HIMSELF VOTE ON SOMETHING THAT MATTERS

Basic rules like; The burden of proof is on the accusor? What you're saying is, I could accuse you of anything, and it would be up to you to disprove it. If you can't you go to jail. The consititution was specifically worded to prevent that from happening. Hell, in the US lawyer leagal system, a forged birth certificate doesn't prove that he wasn't born here, it just proves that some one illegally doctered a document. If it comes down to the courts, you're going to have to prove that he was born some where else, not just that the certificate is wonkey.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/26/voter.suppression/index.html This can happen to any of you. Funny thing, these tactics traditionally target young voters, and it's easy since they more around so much. It could bite them in the ass this year, as the youth vote isn't one-sided this year. RNC voter supression tactics could supress their own votes.

"Survived", "Thrived", "had the biggest surplus in history", same thing.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: Bush has done more to recruit new terrorists in the last 8 years than Osama could ever have hoped to do on his own. Strategic possibility: The Pentagon is trying to send Syria the same message that it sent Pakistan a few months ago: "If you're not going to help, we're going to stop asking for permission."

I don;t like the idea of broadening the war and flirting with international iscidents, but I'm willing to beleive that claim can go either way. It's entirely likely that Damascus added some child fatalities as icing on the cake of this story. Regardless, looks like Bush's Vietnam now has it's own version of Nixons Cambodia. I'm wondering if he's creating an international incident for the next guy to deal with... on purpose. More military clusterfuck turmoil would benifit McCain inthe polls and the election.

Not that it's terribly important: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7692153.stm

Yes and yes, I'm discussing theory. The "gray area" lives only in the moinds of neo-cons trying deperately to avoid loosing to O'bama.

Neither would I, note I said "how he lived after". We don't have a guy that was raised overseas (though he had spend time abroad). "So just throw the Constitution away? " Desperate enough to oversimplify everything your opponents say?

Essentially, I agree. But based on what happened in 2004, we don;t have sufficient machines and polling facilities to cope with the potential turnout. E-Day is going to be a clusterfuck, even with the throughput relief provided by the advanced vote. I'd rather see more facilities and more equipment to handle the load.

What's your last name? Who's your grandfather? Your great grandfather? His grandfather? I know my line and how we got here, some one being foreign born doesn't bother me at all, especially when compared with things that will actually be important while leading this country. I suppose you don't think Kissinger should have had any influence in the path of our nation because he was foreign born? Where his mama happened to squeeze him out is of absolutely no consequence, how he lived after that is what is important.

[Joe Swanson]BRING IT ON[/Joe Swanson] Try California, you'll love it there.

This show has always been well put together, and their covering the 2008 candidates tonight. I got a good lol from the bit bit about the Black Nationalists hating him early on.

If you think that's bad, wait for E-day. Multiply that line timed 4.

Considering the last guy you righties voted in, I'll take formality-based unqualified over totally inept and corrupt unqualified. No matter who wins, Jan 20 is going to be like Christmas. lol, because he remembers the day, time, and place where he was born? Everything he knows about his own birth is based off of the same piece of paper.

HA! I wonder what that cost, and who made it. There was no made-by at the end.

As long as there are deductions, there will never be a truly flat tax.