As discussed earlier in this thread: wasn't that excluded because, as the judge said in the poorly reported link I shared where it showed a vid of literally the judge saying it, it "sounded like it could have been his voice" and not actually him saying it? I don't know if he said it or not but if it's just a voice off camera can that be used as evidence? The judge doesn't seem to think so...which is why, in his words IIRC, it was excluded.
So he was within the law, albeit a poorly drafted one, yet folks (including you) are saying he wasn't?
Not flinging shit. Trying to understand/learn.