RangerTurbo

Yet another thing they try to take over as a privilege that they should control. Get the Fuck Outa Here.

Possibly

Backed into a box truck my very first day after getting my license. Busted the tail light out and left a dent below it that is still there.

Were the movie and the song tied together, or mutually exclusive?

So clarified is a big word to you huh? Maybe you need a comprehension lesson. When I used clarified, it was not battling anyone. It was posted towards the original poster of the thread in thanks for clarifying what he had done to the car. You were the one who acted like your penis got smacked because I questioned him about the wrench time he put in on his car, not yours. Funny, dictionary makes no reference to "speech", it does however call linguistics: -the science of language, including phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and historical linguistics. -The study of the nature, structure, and variation of language, including phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, sociolinguistics, and pragmatics. -the scientific study of language -the humanistic study of language and literature Hrrrmmm, I see nothing there mentioning "speech" or only speech. All those definitions cover speech AND written word. I was right, you are wrong. If comprehension is your strong suit, you may have been able to comprehend the "magician" post as sarcasm. Do you need the definition of sarcasm as well?

I'll race you all the way from Utah. We'll both do a 20 roll, and if your car has a higher top speed you win, it doesn't matter who got to what speed faster. I depend on you to be completely honest though as we'll be racing from 1800 miles apart. Deal?

No no, he called me out on a simple spelling error like spelling is the biggest fucking fad on the internet these days. He made an allusive point that linguistics supposedly has everything to do with spelling correctly. And since I didn't spell clarify right he thinks using linguistics in my post was wrong. Linguistics is the science of language, not the spelling of it. I'm sure he knew that though since he made such a big shot statement.

Keep the petty shit in one thread. I have a Bugatti, you and me race right now from an 80 roll. There is no way in hell you can win right because I would put you to shame with the top speed and you'd hit a speed/rpm wall way before I'd ever have to think about running out of engine, even if for some miracle you could hold off the Bugatti till 200mph, you'd still be the loser right? Saying you win a race because your top speed is higher is bull shit. Sounded like your race was setup to be a pissing match from the get go. It sounded like neither of you made correct terms for such race. It should have been a race to XXX mph and thats it. Not to whatever speed you guys top out at. If one person's car is not able to go 100mph above the starting speed, but the other is, then the race obviously isn't a matched pair to begin with and will be the source for internet debate. Either find a vehicle that is a match for you, or agree to terms that you both can run together with. Racing to 160 if a car or bike can only do 140 is retarded (not saying that was what you guys agreed on). If you setup a car to only be deadly from an 80 roll and up you leave little in the terms of competition. Most people do a 20-40 roll, not many people are going to have the setup to do an 80 roll and up. You leave yourself to pick from a select few, who seem to do more rolls from a lower speed than 80 as well. (based on watching video's and reading the ensuing threads)

Trix are for kids?

I broke my thumb in a fight in highschool. Never had it looked at, just wrapped it up myself. To this day if I hit it just right it will bother me for a good month again.

I've a suggestion. Research what linguistics is before commenting.

You are a linguistical magician.

Thank you, that's all I wanted clearified. I should have expected the usual pickle dick to blow a comment out of proportion and get all anal about a post. This is CR. Nice car btw.

You're completely fucking stupid. You know what was meant by my statement, so don't be a twat. Ford didn't build the engine in my truck, I did.

Talk about blast from the past. I can remember watching that episode of Tales of the Crypt before I really knew what cars were all about.

Did you turbo it or the previous owner turbo it? If it's not your work, I'd hardly call it "your own".

Sam, that hole in the piston a result from a spray'd race or N/A?

Just you, me and the cheeze wiz.

I think its popular for the same reason people like WRC, or drifting, or road courses etc etc. It's just a different aspect or take on a sport that people like to do. Not one type of race incorporates all aspects of racing, and not everyone only likes the type of expereince supplied by a single way of racing. Therefore there are multiple ways to do it.

Yah, You know what I'm sayin?

I can't say I recall watching Mr. Wizard. But can say I thoroughly enjoyed Bill Nye the Science Guy, and the occasional Beakmans World.

should have just PITB

I'm so glad you made it a point to tell us your system performance. I can live again.

Thanks for the info guys. I had found an 04 Arc 2.0T. Dealership didn't even attempt to deal though so I told them they could shove it. Car is still sitting on their lot.

Aint that the truth. With umpteen billion Rangers produced parts are plentiful in the junkyard. If you don't have a turbo specific 2.3T then you will have to find or buy forged pistons. You'll also have to find a turbo head unless you want to run and keep OBD-II, then you can use a 95 or later Dual Plug head, they flow fairly well for what they are stock. There are about as many setup combinations concerning OBD-I, OBD-II, and EEC-IV and EEC-V respectfully as there are days in a year. Then if you're talking standalone that opens up a whole new world of possibilities. Just get to MCIR friday, we'll be there. I'll send you a PM with my cell phone number you can call when you get to the track.