RangerTurbo

IIRC the mustang went MAF from VAM in 89 when they went to dual plug heads , there should not be a map sensor if the EGR is not hooked up then delete it, remove the EGR tube from the manifold to the intake and plug the holes (the upper intake will require you to make a block off plate, extremely easy if you have any kind of skills) if after idling for a few minutes and it acts normal then so be it, if it continues to start to rough idle like you say then you probably either have a problem with your O2 and or computer, either one is cheap to fix (new sensor or a new computer, computers can be had from junkyards for cheap) remember the EGR only operates at part throttle, so if its effecting idle then the diaphram in it is more then likely shot, removing it and blocking it off will help that issue at idle and WOT, but in all my years messing with the 2.3's ive never had a problem with part throttle ping with the EGR not hooked up start with the basics listed here already and go from there, then report back with problems

I'd do er

cause that would be a loss

he didnt log on when i had my account active, i think it was just left as "logged on" from the last time he used that particular computer, i had the fortune to use that computer and access columbusracing only to find that he had never logged off shouldnt stay logged on ona public computer, you will learn grass hopper

sarcasm should be a little more pointed out as for hauling... you guys are kinda right, i try to haul as little as possible, but i did haul the 8.8 axle thats now under the truck in it, talk about sagging the rear end

coming from a guy who's name has the maturaty level of a ninth grader, and proudly displays in his profile that he drives a 2000 Kia Sophia... go you!!! oh and if you qoute Rodney Carrington then you god damn well better do it right "if you play your cards wrong you can take me home tonite"... "cause ive got a big heart and another part, take me home you'll understand because my genitilia looks like a pringles can"

You guys really have taken this thread to two pages....

shit, stupid me, i was asking Turborust and typed your name, no harm no foul though haha, disregard that previous post

sounds like a deal

ive taken 4.6 mustangs a couple times with a non optimum tune, dont know about a 4.6 on spray though ridenred, was that post on there the one where you were selling and i said "can pick em up on ebay for 200$ all day", if so then thats cool that you got that much for it, but you were selling the older style werent you?, i picked up the front facing turbo and its downpipe for that much...

any possibility to get a copy of that maybe???

my truck clocked in at right around 3280lbs with me and a few goodies in it, so i figured about 3200lbs for my truck fully dressed right now, i want to cut that back to about 3000lbs ridenred and turborust, you guys ever visit http://www.turboford.net ??

Coty - im actually probly going to sell the B2 or part it out... anyone want an 86 B2????? a shoot out would be cool, but i dont street race, track time is game though what setup/car does ridenred27 have???

im shooting for slightly faster 12's, my planned setup should be able to get me there... should,... my setup now should be 13's, but i cant back that up, everytime i get one thing fixed to be able to go racing another thing breaks this truck may make it to the track by the time im 40

i understand what you mean now,that would have to a super high speed camera i would think to accomplish that then

yah, true, im only shooting for the ~400HP range, and for my engine the 57 trims and larger are not an efficient turbo, whereas the holset has been shown and proven on Turboford.net to spool just as fast as the stock T3's that come with the engines and is capable of pumping 40psi if i needed it to haha, but everything depends on setup in the long run Nate, you would have thought that a porn called "MegaSquirt" would have already be created

uhh, if the camera was traveling at 6400 mph, it would disentegrate now the camera could have been moving ALOT slower then the missile, but even then it would still have a blurred effect on the missile/rocket

http://i16.ebayimg.com/01/i/05/d9/5d/40_1.JPG 03-04 Holset HY35W http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/3/web/375000-375999/375939_116.jpg T3/T4 50Trim Vs. HY35W... thats just silly http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/3/web/375000-375999/375939_117.jpg http://memimage.cardomain.net/member_images/3/web/375000-375999/375939_118.jpg that t3/t4 housing in the pic is slightly larger then the turbo i have on the truck right now, the Holset is my summer upgrade i plan on making enough power to reverse the rotation of the earth

its not rape, its surprise sex

truth, if its a high speed camera then it would catch the missile while it was moving against the backround, not the backround moving against the missle, therefore the missile and backround should both look stationary barring the tiny details like flame and air movement, or the missile should look blurry and not the back round

fuck shoes

only you

wow, dump truck 1, SE-R 0

takers?

30lbs a peice