TheHaze

Have you seen previous elections or familiar with the typical political projection of each state? Obama has it in the bag.

Definitely in.

Do you like jump blues? The likes of Louis Jordan?

Yay!1 Now he can pay for your gas and mortgage! He'll probably part all of the seas to make easier trade routes, as well.

Hmm, what was he doing on television 4 years before he was president?

And yet, these are the people the wealthier are supposed to support. :jerkit:

Lame. Night Crew section maybe?

Nothing like REAL classic blues like Bessie Smith and Blind Lemon Jefferson. Everyone jumps on board and thinks "music has changed, ugh!1". Of course it has. Frank Sinatra blew off Elvis Presley as just a gimmick ages ago but imagine rock n roll without him. This doesn't include the bands that are conforming to their labels, as they're just assholes. Music never died, it's just hiding.

Clearly you only watch tv for history lessons or you only tune in during elections.

So you stopped short of the rest of the other posts then? It's not so much a gambling issue as it is an amendment issue.

Did you read the issue's fine print? There are many more ways to incorporate a casino in to Ohio than what is being proposed. It's such an odd proposal and a loop-hole haven.

I agree, though I don't think it should not be built because of that. It's others' own moniez that they want to gamble, let them be dumb if they want.

The only "idiots" are the ones who consider the title but not the description. The main opponents are looking at how it would be written and not as a gambling issue.

So a guy who was forced to military by his parents and ends up being dishonorably discharged gets a job as a bagger for 5 years all while internally shoplifting from his company. He's caught and charges are pressed and resorted to community service. All in the mean time he knocks up 2 women and his family takes them under. He then finishes up a 2 year option school. He now has maximum points and his vote counts more than a "better" citizen.

Negative. No republican president has won without it since Abraham Lincoln. Also, both FDR and JFK lost Ohio but look who won those elections.

"It's called 'The annexation of Puerto Rico.'"

This thread is amazing.

Yeah, because you know, you can't look at real news sources on the internet...

Nah, I think she's got a pretty solid face. She's damn fine!

You clearly have great music taste! Seem them live 4 times!

+1 or Charlie's.

George Washington, who also condemned the two party system. That's besides the point for several reasons: it's okay to vote for a party member, but most Americans feel they need to vote for one of them. Some party members are true independents, though they are still party members (i.e. Ron Paul). If you believe you respect your freedoms, than you're still neglecting your number one freedom.

Hmm, you sure do bash others for not doing research and yet...

Again, the reason the elections are the way they are now, is because people vote for who they think will win. It has become more and more problematic and now it's inevitable. This is something in your own mind that won't change until you actually respect the freedoms you have.

Me too! Only the Black Pantherians called me racist.