fusion

Yeah not a fan of the ban. Part of the problem is defining what line if any should be drawn.

For sure. You know either way I'll be out for at least a couple of rides.

The UK colors are almost always better. Sucks. I think I'm leaning toward the white though if I get the R1. Going to have to go down and try and see them all in person.

Long story short --- I crashed at Putnam and the insurance company totaled it. Was fun though.

love that one

Loved my CBR and was leaning towards another one until I read about the changes to the R1. I like Yami's, but the one thing that has bugged me about them was the power band. I've ridden one R1 and one R6, it really bugged more on the R6. With that not supposedly being as much an issue now, it's a toss up. I'm also curious about the new GSXR. I've rode a couple and like those as well. I'm betting in the end it's going to be the CBR or R1. I'm not in a huge hurry though, as i wouldn't have the time (weather permitting) to ride it even if I went over to Southside and got one tomorrow. Need more tea...sorry if that sounds like rambling...

I just wish they would get all the comparos done to help me decide which I'm getting.

Not so fast, it's not that black and white. Russia claimed Israel was massing troops on the Syrian border. Eqypt (Syria's ally at the time) reacts to Syria's request for assistance by blocking water ways and building up troops on Israel's border. Israel launches a "pre-emptive" attack on Egypt crippling them and proceeds to "defend" its self against Syria and Jordan. Egypt and Syria weren't just building up troops to attack. It's a mighty convenient situation for Israel whose leaders had even publicly declared their need to topple Syria prior to that conflict.

You said, "I'm pretty sure every couple of years Israel gets smaller and smaller", your winning map shows an interim agreement (OSLO II 1995) where Israel is supposed to give back land they took (still occupy or control). How does that equal getting smaller every couple of years?

seriously?

First he calls it a "non-stimulus bill", he wouldn't be biased would he? So I was up to the challenge...how long does it take to go through and find the changes... took me 25 minutes to open and go through two of the scanned non-searchable documents and pick out the handwritten changes. Wow hard. Oh wait how did I magically do that? I went to the same place that was made available to everyone else that Thursday night. http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=1694 and http://appropriations.house.gov/

You think if it weren't for US gov't support they wouldn't have been able to "spread" as much as they have?

Really? The video you posted doesn't say that. It just shows a drama queen complaining about the size of the bill and being disingenuous.

Someone other than drama queen Boehner might have been more convincing. That version he throws to the floor is the 2nd...not the first which had been available for weeks. You would hope a Rep is smart enough to read just the revisions. Even the negotiated changes made late the night prior were only a handful. Maybe he's a really slow reader.

Our fault we put them there? That is some rediculousness right there. They wanted to to be there. THEY chose the spot. You know holy land, God's chosen people and all that. From citizens of Palestine to American backed oppressive super power of the Middle East. Israel can suck a dick.

+1 on FruityLoops or Acid

Have any idea how much money we give to Israel?

All bills are tracked on Thomas http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c111:8:./temp/~c1111crbKP::

Texas has been trying this since the 1800s or something. Nothing new.

"Meat n Greet"? Is that like Sausagefest? Is this some gay only outing the rest of us aren't invited to?

You mean that explains Bush's Economic Stimulus Act that did nothing right?

I must be missing where in the article it says the government or somebody in government was trying to limit free speech...

You forgot, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,..." which is where I think he means arguably. It's worded in a way that leaves interpretation, the argument being that the opening phrase is a precondition. The debate over it's meaning amongst scholars is basically at a draw. The best thing people could do is push for an amendment to the constitution that clarifies the individual's right. If the NRA and other advocates spent a large portion of their time doing this instead of foolishly battling interpretations, this argument might be dead by now. I suppose there might not be as much money in it for them though if the matter is mostly settled.