Jump to content

Disclaimer

Members
  • Posts

    15,452
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Posts posted by Disclaimer

  1. Socialist, Marxist, Democrats, Liberals, etc are never gonna be on the same page as Conservatives, Republicans, Libertarians, etc. One side depends on offering more to the recipients so they get their vote! :stirpot:

    Funny you mention that...

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/11/states-federal-taxes-spending-charts-maps

    Wonder what would happen if we left all those "red" states to fend for themselves without the supplements from the "blue" ones?

  2. hy can't social progressives think progressively when it comes to making progress on the way tax dollars are spent?

    I thought I addressed that in the latter portion of my answer.

    maximizing the benefits of a welfare program at an economical cost doesn't equate to zero fraud/corruption... there's always going to be a 'tolerable' level of waste/fraud/corruption/whatever term you want to use, that maximizes benefits at the lowest cost.

    Fundamentally, there's a cost/benefit issue, and you want to be the lowest on that reverse bell curve as possible, which doesn't mean ZERO fraud. It just means that the amount of money spent policing the fraud becomes >> the amount of fraud it would protect against.

    You're a small business owner, so you can appreciate this. Let's say you manufacture ammunition. Are all your bullets with 0 defects? Are all your quality metrics currently at 0 ppm? No? Well, you should spend whatever amount necessary to ensure no defective bullets leave your facility. If that means multimillion dollars worth of robots, then so be it... you can then sell your ammo for $800/bullet because that's the required amount you'd need to charge to cover the overhead of 0 quality issues and turn a marginal profit.

    Or, you hire human workers at a much cheaper cost to do the best they can ensuring part quality. It won't mean 0ppm, but it'll mean you can sell $0.20/bullet that'll work 93% of the time once they leave your facility, with $500k of scrap costs each year for the defects that those human workers actually DID find before they left the factory.

    So, which process is inherently more wasteful?

  3. I agree that I don't envy the poor or their lifestyle. Enough to where I was fortunate enough to have the opportunities I did, took advantage of the ones presented to me, and can live a comfortable lifestyle.

    I can't say I'm "self-made", but I came from a modest upbringing and my parents provided me with the support I needed to make something of myself. Some people don't have that opportunity. It can be overcome, but not everyone can overcome it for whatever reason.

    But, I don't spend my time bitching or jealous that there are some people "freeloading" off my tax dollars. I'm worrying about me. Most people need that help, others abuse it - but as I've tried to explain before, maximizing the benefits of a welfare program at an economical cost doesn't equate to zero fraud/corruption... there's always going to be a 'tolerable' level of waste/fraud/corruption/whatever term you want to use, that maximizes benefits at the lowest cost.

  4. I was under the impression the police broke the door down to gain entry in the apartment. I guess that was not the case?

    Either way, I don't understand the point of pounding on the door if a suspect is behind it... what's going to happen? How often do suspects just open the door and give up immediately? My guess is there would either be a confrontation or a standoff. Its really unfortunate that the officers didn't identify themselves and apparently the guy didn't bother looking out his peephole or window.

    Obviously the moral of this story is 'don't live in an apartment'. Yep, that's it.

  5. I'd probably be dead too if I was in this situation.

    Unannounced men with guns, middle of the night... you think you really have time to have a conversation about why they're there?

    Wouldn't be a bad way to rob someone though... break into their house in the middle of the night, full SWAT gear (so your face is covered), flash a fake badge, guns drawn, tell the victims "Police, get down on the floor!", handcuff them and rob the place blind.

  6. And you understand economics at a 2nd grade level. What benefit do I get from this? NONE. Yes they are charging me $30 to get $23 back from them. Sounds like a typical Obama deal. Screw the liberals. Being still unemployed I fully plan to get MY free Health care, have every check up I'm allowed and go to the doctor for every F'n bo-boo I get. And NO, I won't pay a cent! :p

    Whatever you say :rolleyes:.

    It's obvious by you starting this thread that you're the one lacking in understanding. I know the first thing I do when I have a problem is run to ORDN to tell everyone how butthurt I am about it.

    A $7 increase in your healthcare costs using my taxpayer dollars collecting unemployment to pay for, makes me have sadface for you. $7 you didn't earn anyway, so lets bitch about it.

    Keep looking that gift horse in the mouth.

  7. I'd be pissed too if someone caught me on film driving an Element (or Pilot, doesn't matter and I can't tell the difference).

    I didn't watch with audio (so maybe I missed something), but why did Pilot man feel compelled to get out of his vehicle and start a physical altercation? Good way to get a crowbar upside your head or a .45 drawn on you...

×
×
  • Create New...