New Evidence of Massive Vote Fraud – Where is Eric Holder?

[Strictly Street]

Raleigh, N.C. – House Speaker Thom Tillis (R-Mecklenburg) and Senate Leader Phil Berger (R-Rockingham) issued a joint statement Wednesday in response to more alarming evidence of voter error and fraud discovered by the North Carolina State Board of Elections.

Initial findings from the Board presented to the Joint Legislative Elections Oversight Committee today show:

• 765 voters with an exact match of first and last name, DOB and last four digits of SSN were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in N.C. and the other state in the 2012 general election.
• 35,750 voters with the same first and last name and DOB were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in both states in the 2012 general election.
• 155,692 voters with the same first and last name, DOB and last four digits of SSN were registered in N.C. and another state – and the latest date of registration or voter activity did not take place within N.C.

These findings only take into account data from the 28 states who participated in the 2014 Interstate Crosscheck, leaving out potential voter error and fraud in the 22 states that do not participate in the consortium.

Additionally, during an audit of death records from the Department of Health and Human Services, the Board discovered:

• 50,000 new death records that had not previously been provided to the State Board of Elections.
• 13,416 deceased voters on the voter rolls in October 2013.
• 81 deceased voters that had voter activity after they died.

 

 

 

http://www.westernfreepress.com/2014/04/03/new-evidence-of-massive-vote-fraud-where-is-eric-holder/

 

Tried to find this on a "Big Three" website, but it doesn't seem to be "news".

 

[mattm]

Raleigh, N.C. – House Speaker Thom Tillis (R-Mecklenburg) and Senate Leader Phil Berger (R-Rockingham) issued a joint statement Wednesday in response to more alarming evidence of voter error and fraud discovered by the North Carolina State Board of Elections.

Initial findings from the Board presented to the Joint Legislative Elections Oversight Committee today show:

• 765 voters with an exact match of first and last name, DOB and last four digits of SSN were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in N.C. and the other state in the 2012 general election.
• 35,750 voters with the same first and last name and DOB were registered in N.C. and another state and voted in both states in the 2012 general election.
• 155,692 voters with the same first and last name, DOB and last four digits of SSN were registered in N.C. and another state – and the latest date of registration or voter activity did not take place within N.C.

These findings only take into account data from the 28 states who participated in the 2014 Interstate Crosscheck, leaving out potential voter error and fraud in the 22 states that do not participate in the consortium.

Additionally, during an audit of death records from the Department of Health and Human Services, the Board discovered:

• 50,000 new death records that had not previously been provided to the State Board of Elections.
• 13,416 deceased voters on the voter rolls in October 2013.
• 81 deceased voters that had voter activity after they died.

 

 

http://www.westernfreepress.com/2014/04/03/new-evidence-of-massive-vote-fraud-where-is-eric-holder/

 

Tried to find this on a "Big Three" website, but it doesn't seem to be "news".

 

 

 

LOL.

[magley64]

Tried to find this on a "Big Three" website, but it doesn't seem to be "news".

Apparently the big 3 aren't concerned with bat boy or Bigfoot either...

[ReconRat]

might want to hedge your bets on this one...

if the info came from a Board of Elections, it might be valid

I mean they didn't mention aliens or bigfoot in the same sentence, just sayin'

 

edit: dangit, I had to bump into it in the news...

here ya go, left, right and maybe middle:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/04/02/4813277/nc-election-officials-identify.html#.Uz9tO6Ivlzg

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/voter-fraud-north-carolina-not-so-fast-0

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/03/hundreds-cases-potential-voter-fraud-uncovered-in-north-carolina/

 

It all needs to be verified. What's at stake is the Justice dept challenge of the NC restrictive voter laws.

Edited April 5, 2014 by ReconRat

[magley64]

So did John Smith born 1-1-1900 with social security number 0000 vote 37,515 times? What was the first and last name? What was the dob, and what was the social?

[Gixxus Christ!]

Magdor didn't read the article. He also made himself a little man made of straw....oops, he knocked him down, he must be right.

[ReconRat]

What I don't like is that only roughly half the states decided to do this cross border checkup of voters. The other half declined. Did this fall along party lines? How did that line up, I wonder. If it followed party decisions (which it most likely did), it would once again be cause to worry, for one reason or another. Either accusation or denial. Just another straw (or bale of straw) on top the camel's back.

 

And if we want to blame someone, blame people in general. Everyone has learned to cheat the system in one way or another for personal gain. We aren't good people as much as we used to be. A steady decline. Just an opinion.

[magley64]

Magdor didn't read the article. He also made himself a little man made of straw....oops, he knocked him down, he must be right.

I didn't knock him down, I lit his ass on fire...

[twowheelsnake]

When are y'all going to realize that all this crap is nothing more than tactics made to keep you rooting for your "team" while keeping you from paying attention to what the government as a whole is actually doing?

[ReconRat]

Also realize that if only half checked against half, the actual national total would possibly be around 4 times higher, not two. So these results for one average state times 50 times 4 = 200 times higher for national numbers. I suppose if and when votes cast exceeds the actual voting age population, some one will say we're all lying about the actual size of the population. Oh wait dang it, we already did that... we don't have to be citizens of this countries population in order to vote. Let me re-think this...

Edited April 5, 2014 by ReconRat

[ReconRat]

Ok, actually did re-think. It's pretty common for non-citizens to make a social security card, and even to copy it a bunch of times, for a batch of friends to all use to get jobs here. I've actually seen it happen, kids using a color copy machine to do so. It was amusing. If some of them decided to vote, the result would look like a person living or dead, voting multiple times from multiple locations. Which apparently is entirely possible, since many places do not check a voter's identification that would identify them as a legitimate voting citizen...

[Tonik]

So did John Smith born 1-1-1900 with social security number 0000 vote 37,515 times? What was the first and last name? What was the dob, and what was the social?

 

So if he only voted 37, 514 times you would be ok with that? Just trying to figure out where your threshold is.

[Strictly Street]

It would seem that Eric Holders Justice Department is very concerned that voter Id laws are racist attempts at voter suppression.

But it also would seem that the more states that pass laws allowing voter id checks to be made come up with things like this.

 

Purging the voter rolls of dead people and those that have moved out of state seems like a good idea.

Identifying voter irregularities also seems like a good idea.

 

I am curious why people keep saying that it was a poll workers error. In both states in the same election sounds a little fishy.

Another curious reality seems to be that it falls on party lines who wants to clean up the voter rolls and who wants to leave them the way they are.

 

Ohio did the same kind of checking also and purged the rolls of a lot of dead people and voters who moved away.

North Carolina is far and away ahead of Ohio in sheer numbers of voter registration errors which leads me to wonder what the rest of the states are like.

They only checked against 28 states not all 50. So in present day political terms that means we have 28 racist states and 22 non-racist states.

By inference that would mean that non-racist states seem to prefer dead people on the voter rolls while racist ones do not.

 

For reference, Eric Holders justice Department is suing North Carolina over their voter registration law due to take effect fully in 2015 right before the next major election in 2016. This part of the law is only the verification of the voter rolls called for in the law. The ID part comes later and would be just in time for the next Presidential election.

 

I'm glad to see that the story has been picked up by the mainstream media leading to more reasonable discussion instead of lighting straw men on fire. Curious to see how the story turns out now that it has national attention and it will get follow up attention as well.