Jump to content

mustang question?


Stimmel1647545512

Recommended Posts

okay long story short my girlfriends brothers girlfriend yes i know haha has an 1988 GT 5spd no cats flowmaster and a bbk cold air other that that its bone stock 88 gt convert

 

my girlfriend has a 1992 5.0 lx convert with an aod but its also has exploer gt40 intake bbk 65mm throttle body and spacer march ram air march underdrives coolant line bypass on throttle body mac headers mac pro chamber flowmaster catback 3:55 rear gear and thats all i know of as now bought the car with all this

 

 

any ways the stock 88 blows the lx away is the aod the problem? or does the lx need tuned or somehting ?

 

 

any ideas?

 

 

"1) Tech related go into the tech section.

 

2) Do a search for a dyno. This topic comes up at least once a month.

 

Locked."

 

thanks dark formula im sure "THIS" topic comes up all the time as in these two exact cars maybe someone out there knows somehring about auto mustangs or right or wrong part combo that could help me out but thanks for locking my thread heaven forbid someone see this in the wrong section and maybe offer me some help

 

correct me if im wrong but i dont think i was hurting anyone and since im fairly new to this is sorry i have never seen this same thread when it comes up allllllll the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

iamnotsurebutithinktheolderaodshadlowerstalltorqueconverterssothatmightbetheproblemormaybeitsjustmorewornoutimeanafterallitsa20yearoldcar

 

Use some fucking commas and periods next time. Also, the correct forum is the tech section.

 

Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the convert probably weighs slightly more, and the aod is the killer. also, the rearend gears must also be taken into account. i had a '90 7-up lx convertible with aod and 2.73 gears in the rear---it was a complete dog in every sense of the word; even after i added pulleys, ram air, headers, and a catback (all parts i had left over from my '87).

 

one more thing--if the '88 is a speed density car, which it probably is, then those cars were slightly quicker than their mass air counterparts--not by much, but enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...