JaSSon Posted April 22, 2007 Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 I dynoed mine yesterday. 100% bone stock it put down 106.8 whp and 43.x wtq. The bike made 3 runs and the HP was exactly the same on all runs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted April 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2007 I dynoed mine yesterday. 100% bone stock it put down 106.8 whp and 43.x wtq. The bike made 3 runs and the HP was exactly the same on all runs. Is it a 599 or a 636? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Got-Boost? Posted April 23, 2007 Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 It better be a 599 or I'd find a different tuner/dyno very quick.... j/k It's not that bad. They are both pretty close, the 636 will only have about 5-6 more peak power/torque.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokey Posted April 23, 2007 Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 if his profile is correct, then it's a 2005, which would be a 636. Those number aren't really off the mark for a dead stock one either, figuring different dynos could be off by a couple hp it seems in line with what I've seen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokinHawk1647545499 Posted April 23, 2007 Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 I hate to burst your bubble but those times are CORRECTED to sea-level. Not to mention that Ricky Gadson was the rider when it pulled those times. You are talking closer to high 10's/low 11's off the factory floor. Still not bad for a 636cc (not 599cc) bike like the other 600's... You are still looking at almost .5 seconds difference with equal riders on both which is BIG in drag racing... You guys are forgetting DRY WEIGHT on a bike means NO oil, gas, battery, etc.... So YES it will add another 40lbs. with all that stuff. I have not seen one factory street legal bike UNDER 400lbs. in running/riding condition. lol at the guy comparing magizine times, those things are so worthless, i might look at the mph but knowing it vaires alot. oh and my 2003 R6 weighed in at 390lbs wet (probably with a half a tank of gas) and 636 meh, my R6 would eat any an all i come accross. and its pretty much all stock. i think it only puts down about 93-95rwhp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted April 23, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 lol at the guy comparing magizine times, those things are so worthless, i might look at the mph but knowing it vaires alot. oh and my 2003 R6 weighed in at 390lbs wet (probably with a half a tank of gas) and 636 meh, my R6 would eat any an all i come accross. and its pretty much all stock. i think it only puts down about 93-95rwhp. You must have that R6 with the special sauce upgrade then. :bs: They just tossed the bike on the dyno for shits and giigles- 114.5whp. Ba-Da bing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemosley01 Posted April 23, 2007 Report Share Posted April 23, 2007 Maybe you would beat the rider. I'll bet you would be even faster on a 636 than you would on your R6! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokinHawk1647545499 Posted April 24, 2007 Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 You must have that R6 with the special sauce upgrade then. :bs: They just tossed the bike on the dyno for shits and giigles- 114.5whp. Ba-Da bing. why yes it does have the special sauce added its the black with red flames edition and we all know that they were the fastest R6's evar produced. im not interested in wide range dyno numbers they very to much dyno to dyno only one that realy gives you an accurate conversion to rwhp is the 1320. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemosley01 Posted April 24, 2007 Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 why yes it does have the special sauce added its the black with red flames edition and we all know that they were the fastest R6's evar produced. im not interested in wide range dyno numbers they very to much dyno to dyno only one that realy gives you an accurate conversion to rwhp is the 1320. There you go. Red Flames are like having a 50-shot of nitrous in a hidden bottle. They are only outpowered by yellow flames, which are the equivalent of a 100-shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted April 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 why yes it does have the special sauce added its the black with red flames edition and we all know that they were the fastest R6's evar produced. im not interested in wide range dyno numbers they very to much dyno to dyno only one that realy gives you an accurate conversion to rwhp is the 1320. I agree with that 100%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rustlestiltskin Posted April 24, 2007 Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 636>all 600's :zoom: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokinHawk1647545499 Posted April 25, 2007 Report Share Posted April 25, 2007 have you gotten 10's on that thing at the strip yet then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted April 25, 2007 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2007 have you gotten 10's on that thing at the strip yet then? You taling to white or me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokinHawk1647545499 Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 white Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.