Jump to content

speechless


RUTAN TA1647545492

Recommended Posts

I would because a stock LSx head will own any stk ford sm block head!

 

 

But the cost of getting them to actually work far surpasses any decent aftermarket head/intake you can get (AFR's etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the LS1 was a Ford based engine like that one guy said, why didn't Ford use an engine like this? Take an 02 Trans Am LS1=310 HP. An 02 Mustang 4.6=260HP. Even a 4v 4.6 is still less than the LS1. It seems to me if this was Ford's technology, then they wold be using it. And that looks like way too much of hassle, it would be much easier to just buy a good set of heads and be done with it, IMHO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the LS1 was a Ford based engine like that one guy said, why didn't Ford use an engine like this? Take an 02 Trans Am LS1=310 HP. An 02 Mustang 4.6=260HP. Even a 4v 4.6 is still less than the LS1. It seems to me if this was Ford's technology, then they wold be using it.

The modular motor is over head cams, not over head valve like the LS1. GM likes pushrods, unlike Ford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like a waste on a 302, but on a stroker like he said, it may be worth it. I wouldn't want to step down in displacement. However, this means that high flow 351C based heads would work on a 6.0L Chevy LSx engine too. It would be interesting to see how that worked out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...