Exodus Posted September 27, 2010 Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 Discuss http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/us/27wiretap.html Some people say "if you have nothing to hide, then don't worry about it" I say its the principle of the matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWW$HEEET Posted September 27, 2010 Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 Sounds like a load of horseshit. Basically .gov wanting vendors to open more back doors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exodus Posted September 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 Sounds like a load of horseshit. Basically .gov wanting vendors to open more back doors. Well my back door is shut for any kind of entry. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/27/seeking-expand-internet-wiretaps/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87GT Posted September 27, 2010 Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 That will be impossible to setup for all forms of communication. Waste of time GTFO of my internetz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tractor Posted September 27, 2010 Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 I would be fine with a rule that pushes companies to be "more easily able" to provide emails and other normally private information to courts if ordered by an investigation. It would just speed up the process and make it more universal. I'd be against anything else though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unfunnyryan Posted September 27, 2010 Report Share Posted September 27, 2010 That will be impossible to setup for all forms of communication. Waste of time GTFO of my internetz. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lustalbert Posted September 28, 2010 Report Share Posted September 28, 2010 If you have enoughto convince a judge to issue a warrant to wire tap, go ahead and tap my shit. If you dont, and you violate my 4th amendment rights, then you are fired, go to jail, and do not collect $200. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco-REX Posted September 28, 2010 Report Share Posted September 28, 2010 Stupid. Suspects are already using peer-to-peer communication, as was stated in the article. So it's just a waste of time and money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.