Jst2fst Posted April 3, 2012 Report Share Posted April 3, 2012 Disclaimer: I only mean by the trolling on internet site which are forum based would suck. However I don't think this will go over easy.This would make for some boring internet sites. http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in/arizona-bill-could-criminalize-internet-trolling-184547052.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grapesmuggler27 Posted April 3, 2012 Report Share Posted April 3, 2012 Ghey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanDy Posted April 3, 2012 Report Share Posted April 3, 2012 So what if I'm on a forum based in Sweden, my ISP is Ohio, and somebody from Arizona gets there panties in a wad?-VanDy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exarch Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 I guess the constitution means nothing to Arizona especially the first amendment.... So you can be thrown in jail for annoying someone on the internet? I dont see this going over too well with the public... This is the reason for banhammers and mods... So how will porn sites be effected? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jst2fst Posted April 4, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Who knows, its not gonna be enforced anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imprez55 Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Considering harassment is still illegal if its happening on the net, this bill doesn't really solve anything. So if you use your 1st Amendment right to say something on the internet and someone doesn't click away and gets angry, you can get a misdemeanor. I don't see this passing in the least Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gixxus Christ! Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 I guess the constitution means nothing to Arizona especially the first amendment..... So how will porn sites be effected?I get annoyed when the girl on the thumbnail isn't the girl in the movie, someone should go to jail. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidgetTodd Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Trolling is my favorite pass time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jst2fst Posted April 4, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Trolling is my favorite pass time.Yes, it is but you gotta consider the feeling of those who comments offend them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSparky Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Yes, it is but you gotta consider the feeling of those who comments offend them. Nuh uh... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jst2fst Posted April 4, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Nuh uh...Yea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblosser Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 A section from the proposed law:It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person.The bolded part is way too broad; if the law's enacted and someone's charged with "being annoying", a half-decent attorney will get that tossed easy as pie.I'm no Constitutional Law expert, but I think my First Amendment right to speak annoyingly trumps your right to not be annoyed (which doesn't exist). You're only entitled to "pursue happiness", not necessarily to achieve it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidgetTodd Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Yes, it is but you gotta consider the feeling of those who comments offend them. Um, no, I don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidgetTodd Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 A section from the proposed law:The bolded part is way too broad; if the law's enacted and someone's charged with "being annoying", a half-decent attorney will get that tossed easy as pie.I'm no Constitutional Law expert, but I think my First Amendment right to speak annoyingly trumps your right to not be annoyed (which doesn't exist). You're only entitled to "pursue happiness", not necessarily to achieve it...Legal speak annoys me, I'm calling the E popo on you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblosser Posted April 4, 2012 Report Share Posted April 4, 2012 Legal speak annoys me, I'm calling the E popo on you.I'll hire Redkow to get that sh1t tossed outta court.Then I'll e-sue you for annoying me. Bring it on, mf-er... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exarch Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 I wonder if the chewbaca defense will work in any type of legal action someone files against you on the internet... If so who needs a lawyer? Just rep yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidgetTodd Posted April 5, 2012 Report Share Posted April 5, 2012 I'll hire Redkow to get that sh1t tossed outta court.Then I'll e-sue you for annoying me. Bring it on, mf-er... Stop being a bully. You are hurting my feelings and I am logged in thru an AZ server so you will be in big trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.