Jump to content

For the pro-AWBers


dustinsn3485

Recommended Posts

So your argument is that the ability to carry weapons should be predicated by your intelligence or job standing?

That sounds...idiotic.

No, my point was regarding the average intelligence of the public...

It was in no way to be used as a limiting factor on your rights, but to point out that rights apply to everyone regardless of their intelligence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"legally obtained" is the part we're discussing here. the arbitrary line where the government says "no, that's not legal"

now you're starting to figure it out when you go into all your crazy scenarios I prefer to get semantic ;)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, my point was regarding the average intelligence of the public...

It was in no way to be used as a limiting factor on your rights, but to point out that rights apply to everyone regardless of their intelligence.

So what you are saying is that you have a higher intelligence than the rest of the public and therefore should be able to make decisions for them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what you are saying is that you have a higher intelligence than the rest of the public and therefore should be able to make decisions for them?

Nope, What I'm saying is the rights of reasonably intelligent people are the same rights as total complete fucking idiots. Think of how stupid the average person is, now realize that half the people are even dumber still...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every weapon can be used for combat, so to say that a Glock pistol is a combat pistol is a moot point. A derringer pistol can be used for combat.

Oh yeah.....was just stating what their commonly known as, built for and used for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, What I'm saying is the rights of reasonably intelligent people are the same rights as total complete fucking idiots. Think of how stupid the average person is, now realize that half the people are even dumber still...

So the "reasonably intelligent people" should have their rights infringed upon because other people who are "dumber still" than "idiots" might do something bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the "reasonably intelligent people" should have their rights infringed upon because other people who are "dumber still" than "idiots" might do something bad?

I'm just suggesting that we be more cautious about what are regarded as "rights" and what are regarded as "privileges"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the ability to defend yourself against criminals and a criminal government (were the need to arise) is a right not a privilege. I also believe that our Founding Fathers would agree.

So we should all buy nukes to defend ourselves from our government who has a nuclear arsenal...yes?

what a wonderful idea, where do we buy them? anyone got some uranium or plutonium laying around?

my great uncle has an aircraft carrier I think...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we should all buy nukes to defend ourselves from our government who has a nuclear arsenal...yes?

what a wonderful idea, where do we buy them? anyone got some uranium or plutonium laying around?

my great uncle has an aircraft carrier I think...

What goes on inside your mind? You have some serious mental issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think of how stupid the average person is, now realize that half the people are even dumber still...

Anyone care to venture a guess as to where Magz falls on the bell curve?

Exhibit A:

So we should all buy nukes to defend ourselves from our government who has a nuclear arsenal...yes?

what a wonderful idea, where do we buy them? anyone got some uranium or plutonium laying around?

my great uncle has an aircraft carrier I think...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we should all buy nukes to defend ourselves from our government who has a nuclear arsenal...yes?

what a wonderful idea, where do we buy them? anyone got some uranium or plutonium laying around?

my great uncle has an aircraft carrier I think...

Again you are jumping to extremes with another asinine argument. Never in history has a government used nuclear weapons against its own people. That would be counterproductive. When dictators like that get into power they only want to kill the people that disagree with them. They want power. Therefore, they need people and infrastructure to support that power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again you are jumping to extremes with another asinine argument. Never in history has a government used nuclear weapons against its own people.

WHY? because there are very few nations with ACCESS to nuclear weapons...

"gun control"... same concept... why we're all working so hard as a planet to keep Iran from getting them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the hell? The government and military can have weapons that I can't have?

That's not what the founding fathers envisioned....

Now where is that harrier jet? I need to patrol my neighborhood for evil government spy planes...

QUIET! Adults are talking!

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...