kiggy74 Posted January 17, 2013 Report Share Posted January 17, 2013 http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/8738I think it's BS that the papers can legally report these people's names. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madcat6183 Posted January 17, 2013 Report Share Posted January 17, 2013 I totally agree. A "Resource Officer" as they said is a named target, that comes with the territory. They are not educators, they are law enforcement, in this case this individual is an educator, not a marked target. I think that's BS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted January 17, 2013 Report Share Posted January 17, 2013 The original article:http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/news/local_news/oh_wayne/Orrville-City-Schools-votes-to-arm-sciene-teacher-after-Newtown-school-shooting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonik Posted January 17, 2013 Report Share Posted January 17, 2013 Tough call. We want transparency from the government except when we don't. The right way to do this is to blanket allow staff to carry. That way you don't name names. But I don't understand why they needed to vote. He is an leo. He can carry any where he wants can't he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gump Posted January 17, 2013 Report Share Posted January 17, 2013 Well at least if I was gonna shoot someone there I'd make sure he was busy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.