Leaderboard

Safety first

I disagree. Prove it.

We really don't like to put an employee out like that, but we can't allow this sort of mistake to continue on. There is no excuse for this sort of behavior. I'm very thankful that we're being offered the opportunity to right our wrong, and we will.

The night QSL closes their patio of course.

I'm very sorry for the misfortune, and we will absolutely make it right, 100% at no charge. There is no excuse for this, this should not have left the shop in the manor, and I'm embarrassed that I even have to be apologizing for this sort of situation. I will let Erich, the boss, know about this situation and make sure that it is corrected. This is the exact sort of situation that can hurt and/or destroy our reputation, and we would really love the opportunity to make things right. Thank you for telling us about it, we will make this better.

Store at 377 and 550. All other stores are now obsolete.

Those 5k miles dont mean poop if they are all highway miles lol.

you threw out the ability to stand on moral high ground the moment you used homophobic insults. If you think I am concerned about "my character" to a person both demonstrating for and arguing for intolerance then you don't see the forest from the trees. As for yours, again I don't have to say a thing - your statements do a good job already of making it very clear who you are. If you haven't learned yet that your "reputation" can be undone by one thing you say than you either lead a pretty sheltered life or are under 30. I imagine that will be a hard lesson for you to learn when the time comes. I am not the one sweating here. In fact this is actually kind of fun. Why should I, they took a course of action that I agree with given what little evidence is presented. I am not the one making the argument that the wrong course of action was taken - you are. If you want to make the case that what you think happened is wrong the burden of proof lies on you to support your argument. this is just common sense, no magic here. Flawed logic is not a typo. I haven't pointed out any typos for your argument. You logic is flawed and it is obvious. You are trying to make the best argument you can for why you are "entitled" to use this private thing for free speech when there is no law or right guaranteeing you it. by the way, please tell me you get the irony of being bothered by my differing opinion yet you are arguing for people's right to make hate speech on the internet. I would hate for that little nugget to have sailed over your head like a 747 at cruising altitude. Can you really sink lower? I mean it's possible, but do you really want to?

Your argument was that FPH didn't violate the rules. Do you disagree with the evidence that was presented? Is there a mea culpa forthcoming? Do you know acknowledge that FPH violated the rules, but are simply moving the goalposts so that your argument is now just that they enforced the rules inconsistently (which I've already admitted may have merit)? Then great, the Reddit admins are inconsistent. Call that hypocrisy if you want. Woopty doo. But that's not really what happened. What happened was that a bunch of knobs went on a rampage about how Ellen Pao is a cunt and a bitch (your word) and a Nazi. For enforcing the rules inconsistently. On a free website. Makes sense. And you've decided to hitch your wagon to that train.

Fly 24 hours Will probably take down for winter though.