I hate the TSA just as much if not more than the next guy, but it's not a question of guilt vs. innocence. You aren't on trial, you haven't been convicted, indicted, or even accused of anything. Where the problem lies here is a complete spinning of events and the predictable over-the-top government knee-jerk reaction. Napolitano had the theoretical balls to go on TV and said the system worked. The Dutch guy (who received TSA training, by the way. Everyone on my flight from Amsterdam to Detroit a month ago had to pass through secondary screening at the gate itself) let the guy on the plane, ergo, the TSA has some responsibility for this cocksucker being on board. The only part of this "system" that worked is the passengers realizing after 9/11 that if some guy (especially a foreigner of non-European/American descent) starts doing dumbshit on a flight, there's going to be someone out of the 200+ people on that plane that's going to stop him. What's better, to risk personal injury trying to disarm/stop the terrorist or to hope the bad man goes away and you all die? Then there's the aforementioned knee-jerk reaction. Clearly terrorists are stupid enough to attempt the exact same attack exactly the same way as before, so now we all have to remove the conditions of that attack. Because no one is going to go to the bathroom 1:10 instead of 1:00 before the flight lands, and good luck getting 200+ people to sit straight with their hands visible at all times for an hour on a red-eye flight to Detroit. At the end of the day, it's just more of the same: plain and simple security theater. Guilt and innocence have nothing to do with maintaining the illusion that air travel is 100% completely risk free.