Likwid

Actually, I've heard any image in Google images now falls under public domain if you didn't put a C on the image. Edit: But that may not be correct http://images.google.com/advanced_image_search?hl=en You can adjust it to only show the usage rights you want.

Sucks nothing for me, but depending on the other colors you may have I'll prolly get one for the lady. Subscribed, thanks Liz

fo` sho`

lol, I r bad at mirror image, wanted the logo on the left front... corrected mine above.

I'm in it, but it'd be nice to have a subforum where we can post cruiser stuff about cruising and stuff

Any interest in having a Slow and Lazy sub forum for riding styles? Or like "Comfortably Cruising" or something

It didn't say in the original post if you wanted them emailed only... but here's a KISS one... figured I'd keep it simple. Rocker says "Bringing 2 wheelers together since 2006" but that could easily be anything, I figured this was a tshirt design rather than a slogan contest.

may as well ask here... Do you guys hangout off season? I'd hate to have nothing to do with you folks. halloween party ftw

hey I was going to offer but I saw you were SW... now if you'll let me borrow it for the rest of the season

best weather site ever

lol I'll never understand what those manican posers(?) are thinking.

Dad I know you're sitting on the....nm

You live in the Australian outback?

HE GON GET IT! zz

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_09lz-Fq_w

http://www.ohio-riders.com/ Top right above your rep symbol

How DARE you second guess the flow chart!? Should the results of the vote be conclusive I will submit to my punishment. Currently the position is vacant, should we initiate proceedings to nominate eligible candidates?

You'll need to initiate the appropriate vote, can't skip steps anarchist.

Ok guys, this is rediculous, I've made a flow chart so you can all see how incredibly simple my solution is.

changes reflected above

What's so hard about the new ban rules?! How are you not following this!?

Updated, revisions in Bold New Ban Rules Accuser exclaims that Accused is a filthy liar and would like Accused Ban Accuser hearby initiates a vote to determine if action is necessary The Accuser has 7 days to gain a consensus from 10% of all forum members to initiate "punishment proceedings" If 10% of all members vote for punishment the Accused will then enter into "punishment proceedings" If 7 days has passed and there is either a lack of 10% of all members OR 91% of members vote against punishment the Accuser now enters "retaliation proceedings" During punishment proceedings there will be a 14 day vote available only to users that have posted >50 times in the last 30 days (active users). During punishment proceedings a member of choice will be allowed to kick the Accused in the balls (will call this the JRM provision) If in the 14 days 51% of active users vote for punishment then the Accused will enter sentencing During sentencing a random integer determined by a php rand call of 0-#posts negatively repped will be used to determine the ban length All exchanged goods and/or services must then be repaid within 4 days or the JRM provision will extend behind sentencing (this will be called the djisle provision) NOW If the Accuser does not get the necessary votes to enter punishment proceedings then the Accuser himself then becomes Accused under the retaliation/baseless accusation provision of the new ban rules. Seem fair? Ok, let's go.

Ok ok ok, here's how the new process works. I'll use Accused and Accuser as examples. Accuser exclaims that Accused is a filthy liar and would like Accused Ban Accuser hearby initiates a vote to determine if action is necessary The Accuser has 7 days to gain a consensus from 10% of all forum members to initiate "punishment proceedings" If 10% of all members vote for punishment the Accused will then enter into "punishment proceedings" If 7 days has passed and there is either a lack of 10% of all members OR 91% of members vote against punishment the Accuser now enters "retaliation proceedings" During punishment proceedings there will be a 14 day vote available only to users that have posted >50 times in the last 30 days (active users). During punishment proceedings a member of choice will be allowed to kick the Accused in the balls (will call this the JRM provision) If in the 14 days 51% of active users vote for punishment then the Accused will enter sentencing During sentencing a random integer determined by a php rand call of 0-#posts negatively repped will be used to determine the ban length NOW If the Accuser does not get the necessary votes to enter punishment proceedings then the Accuser himself then becomes Accused under the retaliation/baseless accusation provision of the new ban rules. Seem fair? Ok, let's go.