He's right^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^. The news screwed the pooch on this whole incident. They initially reported the shooter's mom worked at the school and he killed her to get her access badge for the school as well. When they finally changed their story, they never apoligized for spreading false info. Scruit is right about this but our whole world runs on money. No matter what anyone else says this is the cold hard truth. Armed security at schools is a great idea but how are school districts that are already cutting jobs going to afford $50 or $60K per year for an armed and well trained security guard. What if that guy calls in sick? Do they hire 2 full time guards? what about the sporting events and school dances, etc... Now we're talking at least 4 full time armed security guards. That's maybe $200k per year? I'm sure somebody will say "hey, let's offer $20K per year to the guards as a salary". My question is this: Do you want someone who's willing to do it for $20K per year to guard your kids with loaded weapons? You get what you pay for. I like the idea of the armed and trained teachers much more than the armed guard deal. Whatever solution comes from this it has to be cost effective to work. Otherwise it will be quickly abandoned.