The original intent of this thread was to point out the idiocy of the lawsuits that were brought against this company by people who did stupid things that caused injuries to themselves. You've subverted it to a discussion of 7 year olds running around a garage unsupervised causing accidents. Now you're making it a commercial for a subscription to consumer reports. All the while you're still supporting my original suggestion that Darwinism works. Why would you let a 7 year old in a garage unsupervised? That makes no sense to me.Now you're arguing over flame arresting spouts? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a cap (when properly installed) a flame arresting device? If you don't know this, why are you playing with gas cans? If you want to argue,please start your own thread. You're boring me.