-
Posts
2,242 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Events
Everything posted by DaddyBuiltRacing
-
I believe it was the lack of block from Hubbard as stated before. Special tes almost killed OSU today, has anyone checked to see if Tress is alive?
-
http://www.elevenwarriors.com/college-football/2016/11/77258/video-michigans-jabrill-peppers-punches-ohio-state-fan-after-losing-in-double-overtime Hard to really tell from the video
-
The most physical play of Jabril Peppers day occurred after the game as he punched an OSU fan who was talking shit to him. I imagine he should probably be suspended for the bowl game for this, right?
-
OSU wearing tue gun metal/black helmets today
-
Texas A&M says hello and goodbye...
-
My picks: #5 Washington vs #23 Washington St #3 Michigan vs #2 Ohio State #13 Auburn vs #1 Alabama #22 Utah vs #9 Colorado #15 Florida vs #14 Florida State My upset special.... Michigan State over #7 Penn State!
-
It's like there's an echo in this joint or something haha. So I was reading an article posted by MSN in regards to this weekends games. Talk about some terrible writing. Some gems: "Ohio State was nearly knocked off by Michigan State — a team that has won just three games this year. Penn State looked a lot like Michigan in a soul-crushing shutout over Rutgers. Michigan handled its business after last weekend’s shocker against Iowa." Everyone looks like a defensive juggernaut against Rutgers haha. "Michigan got past a scrappy Indiana team on Saturday evening, winning the game that was highlighted by wind and snowy conditions." Umm, the same Indiana team OSU thumped by 21 (yes conditions were better), however were the conditions at the OSU/MSU game ideal? "If not for a failed two-point conversion by the Spartans, Ohio State would have lost this game." This is a known fact? There was still over 4 minutes left in the game... The Wolverines will be coming to Columbus next weekend with a chance to claim the Big 12 East with a victory. If the Buckeyes continue to struggle offensively like we’ve seen so many times this year, then they will lose. Umm....
-
It's like there's an echo in this joint or something haha. So I was reading an article posted by MSN in regards to this weekends games. Talk about some terrible writing. Some gems: "Ohio State was nearly knocked off by Michigan State — a team that has won just three games this year. Penn State looked a lot like Michigan in a soul-crushing shutout over Rutgers. Michigan handled its business after last weekend’s shocker against Iowa." Everyone looks like a defensive juggernaut against Rutgers haha. "Michigan got past a scrappy Indiana team on Saturday evening, winning the game that was highlighted by wind and snowy conditions." Umm, the same Indiana team OSU thumped by 21 (yes conditions were better), however were the conditions at the OSU/MSU game ideal? "If not for a failed two-point conversion by the Spartans, Ohio State would have lost this game." This is a known fact? There was still over 4 minutes left in the game... The Wolverines will be coming to Columbus next weekend with a chance to claim the Big 12 East with a victory. If the Buckeyes continue to struggle offensively like we’ve seen so many times this year, then they will lose. Umm....
-
Dynamo Coin Operated Foosball Table
DaddyBuiltRacing replied to DaddyBuiltRacing's topic in Other Stuff
Close! -
Dynamo Coin Operated Foosball Table
DaddyBuiltRacing replied to DaddyBuiltRacing's topic in Other Stuff
Thank you! -
Dynamo Coin Operated Foosball Table
DaddyBuiltRacing replied to DaddyBuiltRacing's topic in Other Stuff
Don't be scared to shoot me offers, just don't low ball the hell out of me haha -
May be time for a new thread honestly. Also, how the hell does Michigan have 43 seniors lol. That is an ungodly amount of seniors on a single team isn't it? To put that in perspective, OSU has over 40 freshman eligible players. Talk about opposite ends of the spectrum
-
I think today is just one of those days for a lot of teams looking ahead, playing in not so great conditions.
-
MSU has cost OSU a chance at national title 2 out of last 3 year, will it be 3 out of 4?
-
Some games you just get a bad feeling about. Today is one of those. Ive seen this story play out before, stop using the running backs, run the qb and lose. Hopefully im wrong
-
Jabrill Peppers is highly over rated in my opinion. He plays multiple positions and excels at none of them! Put him in the secondary, 0 career interceptions. They line him up at QB when they are with in 5 yards of the end zone. 54 tackles, 3 sacks, 0 int's, 0 fumbles forced/recovered 161 yards rushing, 3 TD's 2 receptions for 3 yards 1 Punt return for TD That's the best player in college? Myles Jack had similar if not better numbers his Sophmore year at UCLA and wasn't even in the conversation
-
I totally agree with you. The Heisman has been such a hack of an award for as long as I can remember. Think about this, there's only been 6 non QB winners in the last 20 years.... Woodson 97 (Amazing top 5 that included, Peyton Manning, Ryan Leaf, Ricky Williams and Randy Moss) Williams 98 (Donovan McNabb finished 5th, had arguably the best NFL career out of the top 5 in votes) Dayne 99 (Beat out the likes of Mike Vick and Drew Brees) Bush 05 (Vacated) (Beat out Matt Leinhart, Vince Young and Brady Quinn) Ingram 09 (Beat Toby Gerhart, Colt McCoy, NDamukong Suh and Tim Tebow) Henry 15 Last time a non QB/RB won it not named Charles Woodson, 1991 (Desmond Howard)
-
The Heisman is a joke of an award as has been discussed several times on here through out the years. Jackson is still going to win it by a landslide. RG3 and Tebow both won the trophy due to gaudy numbers, not because their teams were #1 in the country and undefeated like most cases. I honestly don't even think there's other people worthy of being invited. Hurts is lackluster, I have watched Bama play 4 times this year and not 1 of those games did that kid impress me. 2000 yards passing, 16 TD's and 7 INT's...That is not Heisman worthy at all. Yeah he has 700 yards rushing with 11 TD's but still not Heisman worthy in my eyes. Barrett for comparisons sake, 2200 yards, 23 TD's 4 INT's, 617 yards rushing 8TD's. Barrett also has a little better passing percentage and passer rating. A guy like Curtis Samuel is a dark horse to be invited, nearly 700 yards rushing to go with 750 yards receiving. If he was able to reach 1000/1000 I would almost bet he'd get invited for sure. I don't think he'll reach those numbers this year though.
-
:fuckyeah:
-
I'd say OSU/Bama have identical schedules once you break it down Wisconsin beat LSU Oklahoma is on par if not better than USC Nebraska is better than Arkansas Northwestern is on par with Tennessee Tulsa would give Ole Miss a run for their money if not beat them Michigan is better than anyone Bama has faced, assuming OSU wins this
-
Week 8 1. Alabama 1.005610 8-0 0.632015: 9 2 5 W: #6 Texas A&M 2. Clemson 0.959212 7-0 0.590415: 22 3 5 W: #12 Louisville 3. Michigan 0.955312 7-0 0.585401: 23 3 3 W: #13 Penn St 4. Boise St 0.904857 7-0 0.520531: 50 1 1 W: #24 Washington St 5. W Michigan 0.898741 8-0 0.498426: 68 0 0 W: #51 East Michigan 6. Texas A&M 0.881195 6-1 0.632965: 8 2 3 W: #9 Tennessee 7. West Virginia 0.870836 6-0 0.494448: 74 0 0 W: #54 BYU 8. Nebraska 0.853179 7-0 0.454087: 102 0 1 W: #41 Wyoming 9. Tennessee 0.842134 5-2 0.725600: 1 1 3 W: #15 Florida 10. Ohio St 0.833122 6-1 0.571156: 25 1 3 W: #18 Wisconsin Boise State and W. Michigan are getting mad love from the computers, just not the humans
-
Saw this posted on 11W and found it interesting. For all the hate the BCS received, the mock sure looks eerily similar to playoff committee's picks (they just have Washington/Wisconsin flipped) "BCS" RANKINGS, WEEK 11 RANK TEAM BCS AVERAGE 1 Alabama 1.00000 2 Ohio State 0.95443 3 Michigan 0.86775 4 Clemson 0.86397 5 Louisville 0.85672 6 Wisconsin 0.78255 7 Washington 0.77322 8 Penn State 0.61540 9 Oklahoma 0.60865 10 West Virginia 0.54480 http://www.colleyrankings.com/curBcsLike.html These come out before the CFP selection is known. Interesting to look back at week 9 and see this (On the very far right is what they considered their best victory): 1. Alabama 1.018370 8-0 0.647959: 3 2 6 W: #4 Texas A&M 2. Clemson 0.991946 8-0 0.614933: 12 4 5 W: #11 Louisville 3. Michigan 0.939560 8-0 0.549450: 34 3 3 W: #9 Penn St 4. Texas A&M 0.887924 7-1 0.609906: 13 2 3 W: #13 Auburn 5. Ohio St 0.872586 7-1 0.590732: 18 2 4 W: #10 Wisconsin 6. Washington 0.855981 8-0 0.444976: 110 1 2 W: #22 Utah After 2 weeks it was: 1. Texas 0.781690 2-0 0.563381: 44 0 1 W: #49 UTEP 2. Alabama 0.768720 2-0 0.537440: 53 0 0 W: #55 USC 3. Washington 0.767948 2-0 0.535897: 54 0 0 W: #53 Idaho 4. Tennessee 0.767480 2-0 0.534960: 56 0 0 W: #56 Appalachian St 5. Colorado 0.765268 2-0 0.530537: 63 0 0 W: #52 Colorado St 6. Ohio St 0.764832 2-0 0.529663: 65 0 0 W: #51 Tulsa 7. Wisconsin 0.760661 2-0 0.521321: 72 0 0 W: #66 LSU 8. Nebraska 0.759642 2-0 0.519284: 77 0 0 W: #67 Fresno St 9. Clemson 0.758921 2-0 0.517842: 78 0 0 W: #68 Troy 10. Arizona St 0.757909 2-0 0.515819: 79 0 0 W: #71 Texas Tech 3 weeks had: 1. Ohio St 0.824539 3-0 0.540898: 49 0 1 W: #37 Tulsa 2. Texas A&M 0.824020 3-0 0.540033: 52 0 1 W: #40 UCLA 3. Nebraska 0.817088 3-0 0.528480: 59 0 0 W: #57 Wyoming 4. Arkansas 0.815424 3-0 0.525707: 61 0 0 W: #55 TCU 5. Houston 0.806724 3-0 0.511206: 68 0 0 W: #51 Cincinnati 6. Wisconsin 0.805931 3-0 0.509886: 70 0 1 W: #41 LSU 7. Tennessee 0.803603 3-0 0.506005: 73 0 1 W: #50 Virginia Tech 8. Alabama 0.800029 3-0 0.500049: 79 0 0 W: #64 West Kentucky 9. Louisville 0.791096 3-0 0.485160: 88 0 1 W: #47 Florida St 10. Michigan 0.779734 3-0 0.466223: 102 0 1 W: #44 Colorado 4th week: 1. Tennessee 0.921389 4-0 0.632084: 10 0 3 W: #27 Florida 2. Texas A&M 0.882848 4-0 0.574272: 26 1 1 W: #24 Arkansas 3. Clemson 0.859414 4-0 0.539120: 43 0 2 W: #31 Georgia Tech 4. Michigan 0.842367 4-0 0.513550: 62 0 1 W: #29 Colorado 5. Stanford 0.830344 3-0 0.550574: 39 0 1 W: #45 Kansas St 6. Wisconsin 0.827329 4-0 0.490994: 82 0 1 W: #49 Michigan St 7. Louisville 0.824872 4-0 0.487308: 84 1 1 W: #25 Florida St 8. Houston 0.819713 4-0 0.479570: 92 0 1 W: #39 Cincinnati 9. Wake Forest 0.814373 4-0 0.471560: 96 0 1 W: #42 Indiana 10. Alabama 0.811340 4-0 0.467010: 98 0 1 W: #50 Mississippi 11. Ohio St 0.805657 3-0 0.509428: 67 0 1 W: #35 Tulsa 5th: 1. Tennessee 0.968035 5-0 0.655248: 5 1 4 W: #22 Florida 2. Michigan 0.950829 5-0 0.631160: 9 2 4 W: #15 Wisconsin 3. Clemson 0.945218 5-0 0.623305: 13 2 4 W: #18 Troy 4. Texas A&M 0.901237 5-0 0.561731: 32 1 3 W: #19 Arkansas 5. Alabama 0.856013 5-0 0.498418: 74 0 1 W: #34 Mississippi 6. W Michigan 0.841586 5-0 0.478221: 90 0 1 W: #28 Georgia Southern 7. Ohio St 0.833856 4-0 0.500784: 72 0 1 W: #43 Tulsa 8. Houston 0.831097 5-0 0.463535: 102 0 0 W: #52 Oklahoma 9. Washington 0.825020 5-0 0.455028: 108 1 1 W: #17 Stanford 10. West Virginia 0.823489 4-0 0.485233: 84 0 0 W: #63 Kansas St 6th: 1. Michigan 0.953679 6-0 0.604905: 10 2 4 W: #12 Wisconsin 2. Texas A&M 0.949022 6-0 0.598696: 11 1 3 W: #5 Tennessee 3. Clemson 0.933758 6-0 0.578344: 22 2 3 W: #15 Louisville 4. Alabama 0.920900 6-0 0.561200: 35 0 3 W: #26 Mississippi 5. Tennessee 0.907379 5-1 0.709839: 1 2 4 W: #18 Virginia Tech 6. Ohio St 0.879402 5-0 0.531163: 50 0 3 W: #39 Tulsa 7. W Michigan 0.833830 6-0 0.445107: 108 0 0 W: #52 Cent Michigan 8. Washington 0.829166 6-0 0.438888: 111 0 1 W: #34 Stanford 9. West Virginia 0.819806 4-0 0.479710: 82 0 0 W: #54 BYU 10. Boise St 0.817755 5-0 0.444857: 109 0 1 W: #48 Washington St 7th: 1. Alabama 0.967401 7-0 0.600943: 14 2 4 W: #10 Tennessee 2. Clemson 0.956621 7-0 0.587085: 24 3 5 W: #14 Louisville 3. Texas A&M 0.941982 6-0 0.589310: 22 3 3 W: #10 Tennessee 4. Michigan 0.925305 6-0 0.567074: 32 2 3 W: #24 Penn St 5. Ohio St 0.911716 6-0 0.548955: 41 1 3 W: #25 Wisconsin 6. W Michigan 0.874495 7-0 0.481493: 87 0 1 W: #42 Cent Michigan 7. Boise St 0.859499 6-0 0.479332: 88 0 1 W: #29 Washington St 8. Nebraska 0.857480 6-0 0.476640: 90 0 1 W: #40 Wyoming 9. Washington 0.847300 6-0 0.463066: 97 0 1 W: #28 Stanford 10. Tennessee 0.832458 5-2 0.713161: 1 1 3 W: #16 Florida
-
I know, I was at that game haha. That home/home series was scheduled in 2002, Va Tech went 10-4 in 2002, 2014 they were 7-6. So you really have no idea just how good/bad a team is going to be when you schedule those type of big game match ups. You just hope that a school can remain decent that long.
-
I have a really nice, coin operated (.50 cents per play) Dynamo foosball table for sale. This would be great for a business (Bar/Arcade) or even home use. Comes with 2 balls. It is missing 1 of the score keepers but otherwise complete. Bring a truck as its pretty big. Located in East Newark. If you feel the price is high, do some searching. http://arcadespecialties.com/…/used-dynamo-coin-operated-f…/ $650obo
-
And then played Oklahoma... OSU has done a great job scheduling marquee opponents. The proboem sometimes is a team sucks 10 years after you schedule them (Cal, Va Tech).