Maybe I'm not understanding you, but you say that Obama, Holder, and the FBI urged caution after the Fort Hood shootings. You also say CNN covered that people should be cautious in not jumping to conclusions. Then, you say that a local sheriff in this case said it was political vitriol, but that CNN is reporting there are no political connections that the shooter cites. Now, despite what CNN reported, the only quotes from Obama are expressions of condolences. The headline here is "Journalists urged caution after Ft. Hood, now race to blame Palin." However, the text of your editorial is that different people are now blaming Palin, and the journalists are saying there is no evidence of that connection. Wouldn't the more appropriate headline from the same analysis you give be, "Mainstream Media Resists Turning Shooting Political?" You never mention any instances of other media outlets. You never mention how exactly CNN was linking the shooter with right wing causes. You just assert without evidence. The only evidence you present refutes your very points.